Literature DB >> 17619174

The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?

Jonathan P Evans1, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

The good-sperm and sexy-sperm (GS-SS) hypotheses predict that female multiple mating (polyandry) can fuel sexual selection for heritable male traits that promote success in sperm competition. A major prediction generated by these models, therefore, is that polyandry will benefit females indirectly via their sons' enhanced fertilization success. Furthermore, like classic 'good genes' and 'sexy son' models for the evolution of female preferences, GS-SS processes predict a genetic correlation between genes for female mating frequency (analogous to the female preference) and those for traits influencing fertilization success (the sexually selected traits). We examine the premise for these predictions by exploring the genetic basis of traits thought to influence fertilization success and female mating frequency. We also highlight recent debates that stress the possible genetic constraints to evolution of traits influencing fertilization success via GS-SS processes, including sex-linked inheritance, nonadditive effects, interacting parental genotypes, and trade-offs between integrated ejaculate components. Despite these possible constraints, the available data suggest that male traits involved in sperm competition typically exhibit substantial additive genetic variance and rapid evolutionary responses to selection. Nevertheless, the limited data on the genetic variation in female mating frequency implicate strong genetic maternal effects, including X-linkage, which is inconsistent with GS-SS processes. Although the relative paucity of studies on the genetic basis of polyandry does not allow us to draw firm conclusions about the evolutionary origins of this trait, the emerging pattern of sex linkage in genes for polyandry is more consistent with an evolutionary history of antagonistic selection over mating frequency. We advocate further development of GS-SS theory to take account of the complex evolutionary dynamics imposed by sexual conflict over mating frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619174     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9162-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  100 in total

1.  The evolution of sperm length in moths.

Authors:  E H Morrow; M J Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  David P Froman; Tommaso Pizzari; Allen J Feltmann; Hector Castillo-Juarez; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolution of ejaculates: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Janne S Kotiaho
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition.

Authors:  Francisco García-González; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Sexy sons: a dead end for cytoplasmic genes.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual selection and genital evolution.

Authors:  David J Hosken; Paula Stockley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals.

Authors:  M Gomendio; E R Roldan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1991-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The quantitative genetic basis of polyandry in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  D M Shuker; A J Phillimore; M N Burton-Chellew; S E Hodge; S A West
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  SPERM COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF NONFERTILIZING SPERM IN MAMMALS.

Authors:  A H Harcourt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  27 in total

1.  Patterns of genetic variation and covariation in ejaculate traits reveal potential evolutionary constraints in guppies.

Authors:  J P Evans
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  An introduction to genetic quality in the context of sexual selection.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; Herman L Mays
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Selection on sperm morphology under relaxed sperm competition in a wild passerine bird.

Authors:  Sara Calhim; Helene M Lampe; Tore Slagsvold; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Quantitative genetic correlation between trait and preference supports a sexually selected sperm process.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Janne S Kotiaho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mating behavior and the evolution of sperm design.

Authors:  Lukas Schärer; D Timothy J Littlewood; Andrea Waeschenbach; Wataru Yoshida; Dita B Vizoso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Experimental reduction in dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids depresses sperm competitiveness.

Authors:  Md Moshiur Rahman; Clelia Gasparini; Giovanni M Turchini; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.

Authors:  Julian Baur; David Berger
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  The heritability of multiple male mating in a promiscuous mammal.

Authors:  S Eryn McFarlane; Jeffrey E Lane; Ryan W Taylor; Jamieson C Gorrell; David W Coltman; Murray M Humphries; Stan Boutin; Andrew G McAdam
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Delineating the roles of males and females in sperm competition.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Patrice Rosengrave; Clelia Gasparini; Neil J Gemmell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Genetic and potential non-genetic benefits increase offspring fitness of polyandrous females in non-resource based mating system.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen; Geir Rudolfsen; Matti Janhunen; Lars Figenschou; Nina Peuhkuri; Niina Tamper; Raine Kortet
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.