Literature DB >> 35115179

Understanding cervical cancer after the age of routine screening: Characteristics of cases, treatment, and survival in the United States.

Katie E Lichter1, Kimberly Levinson2, Anne Hammer3, Melissa H Lippitt2, Anne F Rositch4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Given that cervical cancer incidence rates do not decline in women >65, there is generally limited screening, and these women have a poor prognosis, it is imperative to better understand this population. We aim to describe the characteristics, treatment, and survival of women >65 diagnosed with cervical cancer.
METHODS: SEER-Medicare 2004-2013 data was used to describe 2274 patients >65 diagnosed with cervical cancer. Five-year cancer-specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Poisson and Cox regression analyses identified characteristics associated with treatment and mortality.
RESULTS: The median age was 76.1 years, with nearly one-third of cases occurring in women >80 years. Most patients were non-Hispanic White (64.8%), had comorbidity scores ≥ 1 (53.9%) and squamous histology (66.3%). Most women were diagnosed at stage II or higher (62.7%), including nearly one-quarter at Stage IV (23.1%). Nearly 15% of patients were not treated (14.6%). Lack of treatment was associated with oldest age (>80), comorbidity scores ≥3, and stage IV disease. Five-year cancer-specific survival was 50%. Increasing age and stage at diagnosis were significantly associated with lower cancer-specific survival whereas treatment was strongly associated with increased survival.
CONCLUSION: Most women >65 with cervical cancer are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease and many do not receive treatment. Survival is improved with early-stage diagnosis and treatment. These findings, coupled with the fact that women >65 constitute an increasing proportion of the population, highlight the need to re-evaluate screening and treatment practices in this population to detect cervical cancer at earlier stages and increase survival. NOVELTY AND IMPACT STATEMENT: In SEER-Medicare linked data from 2004 to 2013, most women >65 with cervical cancer were diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Both receipt of treatment and survival decreased with increasing age. These findings, coupled with the fact that women aged >65 constitute an increasing proportion of the population, highlight the need to re-evaluate screening and treatment practices in older women to detect cervical cancer at earlier stages and increase survival.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Disparities; Elderly; Mortality; Older; SEER-Medicare; Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER)

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35115179      PMCID: PMC8969176          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  36 in total

1.  Survival and prognosis of women with invasive cervical cancer according to age.

Authors:  Jean Luc Brun; Dorothée Stoven-Camou; Renaud Trouette; Malika Lopez; Geneviève Chene; Claude Hocké
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Under-representation of older adults in cancer registration trials: known problem, little progress.

Authors:  Kevin S Scher; Arti Hurria
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database.

Authors:  A L Potosky; G F Riley; J D Lubitz; R M Mentnech; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Cervical Cancer Incidence Among Elderly Women in Massachusetts Compared With Younger Women.

Authors:  Sarah Feldman; Erin Cook; Michelle Davis; Susan T Gershman; Amresh Hanchate; Jennifer S Haas; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Increased age and race-specific incidence of cervical cancer after correction for hysterectomy prevalence in the United States from 2000 to 2009.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Rebecca G Nowak; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.

Authors:  Bridget A Quinn; Xiaoyan Deng; Adrianne Colton; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Jori S Carter; Emma C Fields
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  It's time to re-evaluate cervical Cancer screening after age 65.

Authors:  Sarah Dilley; Warner Huh; Batel Blechter; Anne F Rositch
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Aged 65 Years or Over with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Shangdan Xie; Shuya Pan; Shuangwei Zou; Haiyan Zhu; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Cervical cancer in women over 65: An analysis of screening.

Authors:  S Yost; A Hoekstra
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-05-22

10.  Cervical cancer screening history prior to a diagnosis of cervical cancer in Danish women aged 60 years and older-A national cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Hammer; Vibeke Soegaard; Rikke D Maimburg; Jan Blaakaer
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.