AIMS: To assess the advantages and disadvantages of four methods for studying compliance with antidepressants: self-report scores, tablet counts, a microprocessor (MEMS) container system and the assay of nordothiepin and dothiepin concentrations in plasma. METHODS: The techniques were used in 88 patients commencing tricyclic antidepressants in the setting of UK general practice. RESULTS: The MEMS system proved to be the most informative technique allowing identification of the precise time of container opening, the demonstration of 'drug holidays' and early cessation of therapy. Self-report scores (Morisky) proved a useful screening technique with a sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 74.1% for > or = 80% compliance. Although tablet counts were possible in 84 patients (95. 5%) they were unreliable in 19 (21.6%). Blood concentration assays proved the least acceptable method to patients and were possible in only 53 (60.2%). A ratio of nordothiepin:dothiepin > or = 1.1 claimed, by others, to identify noncompliance was only reliable when concentrations were low. CONCLUSIONS: Both the MEMS system and self-report scores proved useful methods for identifying noncompliant patients in the setting of UK general practice. Although compliance was higher than reported in previous studies with 70 patients (79.5%) completing 6 weeks treatment, general practitioners tended to prescribe subtherapeutic doses.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To assess the advantages and disadvantages of four methods for studying compliance with antidepressants: self-report scores, tablet counts, a microprocessor (MEMS) container system and the assay of nordothiepin and dothiepin concentrations in plasma. METHODS: The techniques were used in 88 patients commencing tricyclic antidepressants in the setting of UK general practice. RESULTS: The MEMS system proved to be the most informative technique allowing identification of the precise time of container opening, the demonstration of 'drug holidays' and early cessation of therapy. Self-report scores (Morisky) proved a useful screening technique with a sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 74.1% for > or = 80% compliance. Although tablet counts were possible in 84 patients (95. 5%) they were unreliable in 19 (21.6%). Blood concentration assays proved the least acceptable method to patients and were possible in only 53 (60.2%). A ratio of nordothiepin:dothiepin > or = 1.1 claimed, by others, to identify noncompliance was only reliable when concentrations were low. CONCLUSIONS: Both the MEMS system and self-report scores proved useful methods for identifying noncompliant patients in the setting of UK general practice. Although compliance was higher than reported in previous studies with 70 patients (79.5%) completing 6 weeks treatment, general practitioners tended to prescribe subtherapeutic doses.
Authors: Benjamin A Toll; Sherry A McKee; Daniel J Martin; Peter Jatlow; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Katherine Mackey; Michael L Parchman; Luci K Leykum; Holly J Lanham; Polly H Noël; John E Zeber Journal: Prim Care Diabetes Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Mike J Crawford; Helen Killaspy; Eleftheria Kalaitzaki; Barbara Barrett; Sarah Byford; Sue Patterson; Tony Soteriou; Francis A O'Neill; Katie Clayton; Anna Maratos; Thomas R Barnes; David Osborn; Tony Johnson; Michael King; Peter Tyrer; Diana Waller Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Christopher J Gill; Lora L Sabin; Davidson H Hamer; Xu Keyi; Zhang Jianbo; Tao Li; Wan-Ju Wu; Ira B Wilson; Mary Bachman Desilva Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2009-04-08