Literature DB >> 10929338

[Cemented hip prosthesis implantation--decreasing the rate of fat embolism with pulsed pressure lavage].

S J Breusch1, T Reitzel, U Schneider, M Volkmann, V Ewerbeck, M Lukoschek.   

Abstract

Intraoperative fat embolism associated with cemented total hip arthroplasty is a well recognized complication. In a new sheep model allowing for standardized bilateral, simultaneous cement pressurization we studied the effectiveness of both pulsatile and syringe lavage of equal volume with regard to their cleansing capabilities as measured by fat and bone marrow intravasation. The operative procedure involved bilateral placement of intravenous catheters into the external iliac veins via retroperitoneal approach. After femoral neck osteotomies both femoral cavities were prepared for retrograde cement application. After randomization one side was lavaged with 250 ml irrigation using a bladder syringe, the contralateral femur with the identical volume but using a pulsatile lavage. A specially designed apparatus was used to allow for bilateral simultaneous cement pressurization. Venous blood from both iliac catheters was then collected, anticoagulated and a quantitative and qualitative fat analysis was performed. Despite equal volume manual lavage produced significantly higher fat and bone marrow intravasation (P < 0.001) than pulsatile lavage thus suggesting that not only the volume but also the quality of bone lavage is an essential factor influencing the risk of fat embolism and adverse cardiorespiratory effects. Our findings further emphasize the important role of pulsatile lavage in preventing fat and bone marrow embolisation during cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10929338     DOI: 10.1007/s001320050496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  8 in total

1.  [Augmentation with PMMA cement].

Authors:  K-D Kühn; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Prosthetic care of proximal femur fractures].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; T Lein; T Hohaus; A Weber
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Effect of femoral cementing technique on results. Comparison between retrograde technique and vacuum application].

Authors:  S Ungethuem; B Lehner; T Reitzel; P J Buckley; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The pulsed lavage pouch.

Authors:  R M A Hawken; R J Kincaid
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Polymethylmethacrylate extrusion into the femoral nutrient vessel during arthroplasty: A phenomenon to be aware of.

Authors:  Peter J Smitham; Caroline Perkins; Martin Williams; Steve Eastaugh-Waring
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2009-02-01

6.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture? Data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.

Authors:  Torbjørn B Kristensen; Eva Dybvik; Målfrid Kristoffersen; Håvard Dale; Lars Birger Engesæter; Ove Furnes; Jan-Erik Gjertsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  The Relative Merits of Cemented and Uncemented Prostheses in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joanna Maggs; Matthew Wilson
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Does the line-to-line cementing technique of the femoral stem create an adequate cement mantle?

Authors:  Kirsti Sevaldsen; Otto S Husby; Øystein B Lian; Vigdis S Husby
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.135

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.