Literature DB >> 15864509

[Prosthetic care of proximal femur fractures].

F Bonnaire1, T Lein, T Hohaus, A Weber.   

Abstract

The endoprosthetic replacement of the hip joint or its components in fractures of the proximal femur is a standard method. Indications for replacement are strongly dislocated intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, fractures with an existing arthritis of the hip joint, and profound osteoporosis. Improved perioperative management and more gentle anesthetic techniques have helped to reduce perioperative mortality from nearly 50% to 11.5% over the last 40 years. As routine treatment options, the bipolar endoprosthesis without replacement of the acetabular joint surface and total hip replacement in case of degenerative arthritis of the acetabular joint surface are commonly used. The mere replacement of the femoral head with a simple femoral head prosthesis should be reserved for exceptional cases. For the implantation of a hip joint prosthesis and its uncomplicated post-treatment and long-term durability, careful preoperative planning is essential together with the selection of a suitable implant, its optimal bony fixation, avoidance of intra-operative complications and restoration of the anatomical landmarks such as the centre of rotation of the hip joint, the offset of the prosthetic shaft as well as leg length. Despite the high standard of endoprosthetics in Germany, the results are still improvable in comparison to other countries. Measures which preserve the joint as well as the bone will be increasingly important in prophylaxis of further complications. In addition, more attention should be paid to the prophylaxis of falls and a sufficiently guide-lined therapy of osteoporosis for the prophylaxis of fractures of the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864509     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-005-0942-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  33 in total

Review 1.  [Anchoring principles in hip prosthesis implantation. II: Acetabulum components].

Authors:  S J Breusch; P R Aldinger; M Thomsen; M Lukoschek; V Ewerbeck
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Anchoring principles in hip endoprostheses. I: Prosthesis stem].

Authors:  S J Breusch; P R Aldinger; M Thomsen; V Ewerbeck; M Lukoschek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Medial femoral neck fracture. Controversies in treatment].

Authors:  E L F B Raaymakers; M Schafroth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Fracture of femoral neck: analysis of the results of external quality assurance. A report on 22,556 patients].

Authors:  R Smektala; M Wenning; A Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  [Importance of structural principles of the bracing and kinetic apparatus with regard to stress on the long bones].

Authors:  F PAUWELS
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1951

6.  A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis following elective total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K B Freedman; K R Brookenthal; R H Fitzgerald; S Williams; J H Lonner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Risk factors for heterotopic ossification in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Eggli; A Woo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results.

Authors:  E Ebramzadeh; A Sarmiento; H A McKellop; A Llinas; W Gogan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Long-term results of Charnley total hip replacement. Review of 92 patients at 15 to 20 years.

Authors:  L Neumann; K G Freund; K H Sørenson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-03

10.  [Osteomyelitis after endoprostheses].

Authors:  R Haaker; A Senge; J Krämer; F Rubenthaler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Optimal timing of operations to treat fractures of the femoral neck with endoprotheses : CRP as a parameter of postoperative immunologic reaction].

Authors:  M Neumaier; H Vester; F Martetschläger; T Freude; M A Scherer; U Stöckle
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Dislocated femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients. One-year follow-up].

Authors:  A Prokop; F Fröhlich; R Dolezych; M Chmielnicki
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 3.  [Femoral neck fractures in young patients].

Authors:  S Fitschen-Oestern; S Lippross; T Klüter; P Behrend; M Weuster; A Seekamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures and consecutive stem replacement. Analysis of survival, complications, and quality of life].

Authors:  R Langenhan; P Trobisch; B Hohendorff; M Baumann; A Probst
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Hemiprosthesis for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Retrospective Study of 319 Patients.

Authors:  Axel Prokop; Marc Chmielnicki
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2016-06-29

6.  [Development of the inpatient quality of care of surgically treated patients with a proximal femoral fracture in North Rhine-Westphalia : Analysis of 61,249 treatment courses based on data from external inpatient quality assurance].

Authors:  C J Neumann; U Schulze-Raestrup; C M Müller-Mai; R Smektala
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-07-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.