Literature DB >> 10926238

Intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fractures: treatment with the long Gamma nail.

A Barquet1, L Francescoli, D Rienzi, L López.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of the treatment of intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fractures (subtrochanteric fractures with extension into the greater trochanter and the piriformis fossa) using the long Gamma nail.
DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive.
SETTING: Multicenter (private clinics). PATIENTS: Fifty-two closed intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fractures in nonpathologic bone in fifty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of forty-five years (range, 18 to 91 years). INTERVENTION: Closed reduction and internal fixation with the long Gamma nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Analysis of clinical and radiologic results with emphasis on the incidence of complications. Outcome assessment comparing the preinjury status of every patient with the status at a minimum follow-up of twelve months.
RESULTS: At one year, seven patients had died and two other patients were lost to follow-up. Thus, forty-three of the fifty-two patients completed a prospective follow-up averaging sixteen months (range, 12 to 31 months). All fractures united within an average of 4.3 months (range, 3 to 6.5 months). Mechanical complications (breakage of the distal locking bolts) occurred in one fracture. Two patients had more than 5 degrees but less than 10 degrees of deformity in varus and more than one but less than 2.5 centimeters of shortening; two had more than 5 degrees of deformity in varus; and two had up to one centimeter of shortening. Two patients had other severe injuries that influenced the end result. Thirty-four of the remaining forty-one patients (82.9 percent) were restored to their preinjury status. There was no direct relationship between the radiologic and the functional results: an excellent radiologic result was not uniformly associated with an excellent functional outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction and long Gamma nailing of intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fractures enables the orthopaedic surgeon to treat these fractures with a minimally invasive procedure and a negligible rate of mechanical complications. The rate of union was 100 percent in this series. The rate of restitution to the preinjury status was high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10926238     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200006000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  17 in total

1.  A novel technique for the fixation of inter-trochantieric hip fractures: A telescoping lag screw.

Authors:  Devin M Jagow; Shahan V Yacoubian; Edward J McCrink; Stephan V Yacoubian
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-08

2.  Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: a standard or long nail?

Authors:  Güvenir Okcu; Nadir Ozkayin; Cemil Okta; Ismet Topcu; Kemal Aktuglu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Stabilization of inter- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures with the PFNΑ®].

Authors:  O Büttner; S Styger; P Regazzoni; N Suhm
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Minimally invasive treatment of displaced femoral shaft fractures with a rapid reductor and intramedullary nail fixation.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Tao Zhang; Juan Wang; Bo Liu; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of two fixation methods.

Authors:  Yih-Shiunn Lee; Hui-Ling Huang; Ting-Ying Lo; Chien-Rae Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Thorben Müller; Tobias Topp; Christian A Kühne; Gershon Gebhart; Steffen Ruchholtz; Ralph Zettl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?

Authors:  Rafael Luque Pérez; Pablo Checa Betegón; María Galán-Olleros; Camila Arvinius; Jose Valle-Cruz; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Displaced femoral shaft fractures treated by antegrade nailing with the assistance of an intramedullary reduction device.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Yongmin Jing; Hongzhi Lv; Juan Wang; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Unstable subtrochanteric fractures--gamma nail versus dynamic condylar screw.

Authors:  Andrés J Pakuts
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Pertrochanteric fractures: tips and tricks in nail osteosynthesis.

Authors:  A H Ruecker; J M Rueger
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.