Literature DB >> 33146752

Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?

Rafael Luque Pérez1, Pablo Checa Betegón2, María Galán-Olleros2, Camila Arvinius2, Jose Valle-Cruz2, Fernando Marco2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengths of nails.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study including 123 pertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures 31A2 treated with Gamma3 nail® between January/2017 and January/2019. 19 patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 104 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Two groups, Long Dynamic Gamma3 Nail (LGN) and Short Static Gamma3 Nail (SGN), with 52 patients each were compared. Mean age was 81 years (range 50-99), being 78% female. Preoperative variables included: age, medical comorbidities, mobility, anesthetic risk, associated fractures, hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Postoperatively, functional and radiological results, quality of life, hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration, transfusion requirements, mobility, and pain were evaluated. Additionally, perioperative complications were also analyzed, such as malunion, non-union, infection rates, cut-outs, and peri-implant fractures.
RESULTS: A correct radiological fracture reduction was obtained in 73% of the cases (73% SGN/74% LGN). Two patients in LGN group had intraoperative complications (greater trochanter fractures). 38% of the patients with LGN presented nail tip impaction upon the distal anterior femoral cortex, associated with anterior knee pain. Blood loss and operative time was statistically different between groups. Despite the previous, no differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study comparing two lengths of the Gamma3 Nail in 31A2 fractures showed no overall differences in clinical and radiological outcomes, and complication rates. However, the use of LGN was associated with a statistically significant higher blood loss and operative time, and a tendency for increased need for transfusion, and anterior knee pain and reoperation rate. Therefore, we recommend the use of locked SGN in the treatment of 31A2 fractures.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative study; Fracture fixation; Hip fractures; Intramedullary; Intramedullary nailing; Trochanteric fractures

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33146752     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  21 in total

1.  A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Tristan M Barton; Robert Gleeson; Claire Topliss; Rosemary Greenwood; William J Harries; Timothy J S Chesser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Different Intramedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur.

Authors:  Lorenzo Andreani; Enrico Bonicoli; Nicola Piolanti; Paolo Parchi; Francesco Niccolai; Alessandra Carmignani; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2015-11

3.  Treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation and gamma nail 3.

Authors:  Yaozeng Xu; Dechun Geng; Huiling Yang; Xianbin Wang; Guangming Zhu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Expandable proximal femoral nail versus gamma proximal femoral nail for the treatment of AO/OTA 31A1-3 fractures.

Authors:  Drexler Michael; Warschawski Yaniv; Frenkel Rutenberg Tal; G Kessler Evan; Amar Eyal; Snir Nimrod; Rath Ehud; Eizenberg Gilad; Steinberg L Ely
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.

Authors:  Conor Kleweno; Jordan Morgan; James Redshaw; Mitchel Harris; Edward Rodriguez; David Zurakowski; Mark Vrahas; Paul Appleton
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Necrosis of the femoral head after fixation of trochanteric fractures with Gamma Locking Nail. A cause of late mechanical failure.

Authors:  C Vicario; F Marco; L Ortega; M Alcobendas; I Dominguez; L López-Durán
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Trochanteric hip fractures. Fixation failure commoner with femoral medialization, a comparison of 101 cases.

Authors:  M J Parker
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-08

8.  Mismatch of long Gamma intramedullary nail with bow of the femur: Does radius of curvature of the nail increase risk of distal femoral complications?

Authors:  A Shetty; P M Shenoy; R Swaminathan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-12-21

9.  Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Shi-Min Chang; Ying-Qi Zhang; Zhuo Ma; Qing Li; Jens Dargel; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Long versus short cephalomedullary nail for trochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review.

Authors:  John Dunn; Nicholas Kusnezov; Julia Bader; Brian R Waterman; Justin Orr; Philip J Belmont
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-19
View more
  4 in total

1.  Short versus long cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of 3208 patients.

Authors:  Mark E Cinque; L Henry Goodnough; Blake J Schultz Md; Andrew T Fithian; Malcolm DeBaun; Justin F Lucas; Michael J Gardner Md; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  CT analysis of femoral malrotation after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Jakub Maléř; Valér Džupa; Michal Buk; Martin Michna; Jiří Marvan; Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  High risks of failure observed for A1 trochanteric femoral fractures treated with a DHS compared to the PFNA in a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Max P L van der Sijp; Marianne de Groot; Sven A Meylaerts; Karel J du Pré; Sander M Verhage; Inger B Schipper; Arthur H P Niggebrugge
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Intertrochanteric fracture fixation in solid organ transplant patients: outcomes and survivorship.

Authors:  Michael J VanWagner; Steven B Porter; Aaron C Spaulding; Glenn G Shi; Benjamin K Wilke; Cameron K Ledford
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.928

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.