Literature DB >> 26816058

Pertrochanteric fractures: tips and tricks in nail osteosynthesis.

A H Ruecker1, J M Rueger2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures has become the standard method of fixation especially in unstable fracture types. Even though there have been developments on implant design and technology, the surgical technique of reduction and implant positioning remains the mandatory factor in treating these fractures successfully. The advantages of nailing in the mainly elderly patients sustaining intertrochanteric femur fractures are a short lever arm and a lateral support in the trochanter supplied by the nail. The disadvantages are that it is often harder to achieve a closed reduction of a displaced fracture and to maintain the reduction with the intramedullary implant. TIPS AND TRICKS: To obtain and maintain anatomic reduction and a secure fracture fixation, the surgical approach and fixation technique is of great importance. It starts with correct patient positioning, fracture reduction (accounting for varus dislocation and dislocation of flexed fragments), choosing the correct nail entry point and perfect lag screw positioning within the head-neck fragment and distal locking. To maintain the reduction achieved intraoperatively, the decision has to be made to use a cerclage wiring or to tolerate fracture gaps in the metaphyseal area. Intraoperative controlled compression of the neck or the subtrochanteric area is of great importance to reduce delayed unions or nonunions. Intramedullary fixation of unstable per-, inter- or subtrochanteric fractures shows biomechanical advantages compared to extramedullry fixation techniques. Even though there have been several amendments and developments of implants, a better implant does not compensate for an inadequate surgical approach or deficient surgical techniques which are paramount for successful treatment. When fixing fractures with intramedullary nailing systems, the surgeon should always try to achieve anatomic reduction and a perfect implant positioning to allow immediate full weight bearing without an increased risk of cut-out, non-union and implant failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femur; Fixation; Fracture; Intertrochanteric

Year:  2014        PMID: 26816058     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0366-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  17 in total

1.  Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  An intramedullary fixation device for the proximal part of the femur. Nine years' experience.

Authors:  R E Zickel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Christophe Sadowski; Anne Lübbeke; Marc Saudan; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Use of the Gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  J A Valverde; M G Alonso; J G Porro; D Rueda; P M Larrauri; J J Soler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A new fixation device for subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: a preliminary report.

Authors:  R E Zickel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1967 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Multicenter trial of modified Gamma nail in East Asia.

Authors:  K S Leung; C M Chen; W S So; K Sato; C H Lai; B Machaisavariya; S Suntharalingam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fractures: treatment with the long Gamma nail.

Authors:  A Barquet; L Francescoli; D Rienzi; L López
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  P Harrington; A Nihal; A K Singhania; F R Howell
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures. 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients.

Authors:  A K Aune; A Ekeland; B Odegaard; B Grøgaard; A Alho
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1994-04

10.  A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail.

Authors:  P J Radford; M Needoff; J K Webb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  A novel cerclage wiring technique in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nails in young adults.

Authors:  You-Shui Gao; Yan-Jie Guo; Xin-Gang Yu; Yang Chen; Chen Chen; Nan-Ji Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.