Literature DB >> 10920466

Psychological responses of women after first-trimester abortion.

B Major1, C Cozzarelli, M L Cooper, J Zubek, C Richards, M Wilhite, R H Gramzow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over psychological risks associated with abortion. The objectives of this study were to examine women's emotions, evaluations, and mental health after an abortion, as well as changes over time in these responses and their predictors.
METHODS: Women arriving at 1 of 3 sites for an abortion of a first-trimester unintended pregnancy were randomly approached to participate in a longitudinal study with 4 assessments-1 hour before the abortion, and 1 hour, 1 month, and 2 years after the abortion. Eight hundred eighty-two (85%) of 1043 eligible women approached agreed; 442 (50%) of 882 were followed for 2 years. Preabortion and postabortion depression and self-esteem, postabortion emotions, decision satisfaction, perceived harm and benefit, and posttraumatic stress disorder were assessed. Demographic variables and prior mental health were examined as predictors of postabortion psychological responses.
RESULTS: Two years postabortion, 301 (72%) of 418 women were satisfied with their decision; 306 (69%) of 441 said they would have the abortion again; 315 (72%) of 440 reported more benefit than harm from their abortion; and 308 (80%) of 386 were not depressed. Six (1%) of 442 reported posttraumatic stress disorder. Depression decreased and self-esteem increased from preabortion to postabortion, but negative emotions increased and decision satisfaction decreased over time. Prepregnancy history of depression was a risk factor for depression, lower self-esteem, and more negative abortion-specific outcomes 2 years postabortion. Younger age and having more children preabortion also predicted more negative abortion evaluations.
CONCLUSIONS: Most women do not experience psychological problems or regret their abortion 2 years postabortion, but some do. Those who do tend to be women with a prior history of depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10920466     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.8.777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  43 in total

1.  Depression and unintended pregnancy in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth: a cohort study.

Authors:  David C Reardon; Jesse R Cougle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-19

2.  Depression and unintended pregnancy in young women. Paper raises at least three concerns.

Authors:  Robert S Kahn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-04

3.  Psychiatric admissions of low-income women following abortion and childbirth.

Authors:  David C Reardon; Jesse R Cougle; Vincent M Rue; Martha W Shuping; Priscilla K Coleman; Philip G Ney
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Fear of pregnancy and childbirth.

Authors:  K Hofberg; M R Ward
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Psychological Aspects of Contraception, Unintended Pregnancy, and Abortion.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Lisa R Rubin
Journal:  Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-10

Review 6.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  The Embrace of the Proabortion Turnaway Study: Wishful Thinking? or Willful Deceptions?

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-06-20

8.  Why postnatal abortion throws the baby out with the bath water.

Authors:  Michele Loi
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2013-09

9.  Current and past depressive symptoms and contraceptive effectiveness level method selected among women seeking reproductive health services.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Nancy E Adler; Kirsten M Thompson; Carolyn Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Psychological distress and post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level chosen at an urban clinic.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Jeanne M Tschann; Jillian T Henderson; Eleanor A Drey; Jody E Steinauer; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.