Literature DB >> 12743066

Psychiatric admissions of low-income women following abortion and childbirth.

David C Reardon1, Jesse R Cougle, Vincent M Rue, Martha W Shuping, Priscilla K Coleman, Philip G Ney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about whether abortion or childbirth is associated with greater psychological risks. We compared psychiatric admission rates of women in time periods from 90 days to 4 years after either abortion or childbirth.
METHODS: We used California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) records of women aged 13-49 years at the time of either abortion or childbirth during 1989. Only women who had no psychiatric admissions or pregnancy events during the year before the target pregnancy event were included (n = 56 741). Psychiatric admissions were examined using logistic regression analyses, controlling for age and months of eligibility for Medi-Cal services.
RESULTS: Overall, women who had had an abortion had a significantly higher relative risk of psychiatric admission compared with women who had delivered for every time period examined. Significant differences by major diagnostic categories were found for adjustment reactions (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.1), single-episode (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9) and recurrent depressive psychosis (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.5), and bipolar disorder (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.0). Significant differences were also observed when the results were stratified by age.
INTERPRETATION: Subsequent psychiatric admissions are more common among low-income women who have an induced abortion than among those who carry a pregnancy to term, both in the short and longer term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12743066      PMCID: PMC154179     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  13 in total

1.  Perceived social support, self-efficacy, and adjustment to abortion.

Authors:  B Major; C Cozzarelli; A M Sciacchitano; M L Cooper; M Testa; P M Mueller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-09

Review 2.  Psychological impact of abortion: methodological and outcomes summary of empirical research between 1966 and 1988.

Authors:  J L Rogers; G B Stoms; J L Phifer
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1989

3.  Psychiatric morbidity and acceptability following medical and surgical methods of induced abortion.

Authors:  D R Urquhart; A A Templeton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-04

4.  Selection bias in a study on how women experienced induced abortion.

Authors:  H Söderberg; C Andersson; L Janzon; N O Sjöberg
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Suicides after pregnancy. Mental health may deteriorate as a direct effect of induced abortion.

Authors:  C L Morgan; M Evans; J R Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-03-22

6.  Mixed messages: implications of social conflict and social support within close relationships for adjustment to a stressful life event.

Authors:  B Major; J M Zubek; M L Cooper; C Cozzarelli; C Richards
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-06

Review 7.  The psychological complications of therapeutic abortion.

Authors:  G Zolese; C V Blacker
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Emotional distress following induced abortion: a study of its incidence and determinants among abortees in Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  H Söderberg; L Janzon; N O Sjöberg
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women: 1976 to 1988.

Authors:  E F Jones; J D Forrest
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1992-02

10.  Abortion and subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  C F Bradley
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.356

View more
  23 in total

1.  Psychological implications of abortion--highly charged and rife with misleading research.

Authors:  Brenda Major
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Denise Sevier-Fries
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Stephen Genuis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Gail Erlick Robinson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Annie D Banno
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Shauna C Hollingshead
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Linda Capperauld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Unwanted results: the ethics of controversial research.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Aaron Keshen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Psychological aftermath of abortion.

Authors:  L L deVeber; Ian Gentles
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.