Literature DB >> 30275603

The Embrace of the Proabortion Turnaway Study: Wishful Thinking? or Willful Deceptions?

David C Reardon1.   

Abstract

The abortion advocacy group Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) has published over twenty papers based on a case series of women taking part in their Turnaway Study. Following the lead of ANSIRH news releases, major media outlets have described these results as proof that (a) most women who have abortions are glad they did, (b) there is no evidence of negative mental health effects following abortion, and (c) the only women really suffering are those who are being denied late-term abortions due to legal restrictions based on gestational age. Buried in ANSIRH's papers are the facts that over 68 percent of the women they sought to interview refused, their own evidence confirms that the remnant who did participate were atypical, there are no known benefits from abortion, their methods are misleadingly described, and their results are selectively reported. Summary: Widely publicized claims regarding the benefits of abortion for women have been discredited. The Turnaway Study, conducted by abortion advocates at thirty abortion clinics, reportedly proves that 95 percent of women have no regrets about their abortions and that abortion causes no mental health problems. But a new exposé reveals that the authors have misled the public, using an unrepresentative, highly biased sample and misleading questions. In fact, over two-thirds of the women approached at the abortion clinics refused to be interviewed, and half of those who agreed dropped out. Refusers and dropouts are known to have more postabortion problems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Abortion Decision satisfaction; Abortion mental health; Media bias; Postabortion trauma; Reproductive health; Research bias; Turnaway Study

Year:  2018        PMID: 30275603      PMCID: PMC6161227          DOI: 10.1177/0024363918782156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  21 in total

1.  Distinguishing case series from cohort studies.

Authors:  Olaf M Dekkers; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Selection bias in a study on how women experienced induced abortion.

Authors:  H Söderberg; C Andersson; L Janzon; N O Sjöberg
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Legal abortion: a painful necessity.

Authors:  A Kero; U Högberg; L Jacobsson; A Lalos
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Abortion and subsequent substance abuse.

Authors:  D C Reardon; P G Ney
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.829

5.  Personal resilience, cognitive appraisals, and coping: an integrative model of adjustment to abortion.

Authors:  B Major; C Richards; M L Cooper; C Cozzarelli; J Zubek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-03

6.  Induced abortion and traumatic stress: a preliminary comparison of American and Russian women.

Authors:  Vincent M Rue; Priscilla K Coleman; James J Rue; David C Reardon
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2004-09-23

7.  Abortion and mental health disorders: evidence from a 30-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  David M Fergusson; L John Horwood; Joseph M Boden
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Psychological impact on women after second and third trimester termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies versus women after preterm birth--a 14-month follow up study.

Authors:  Anette Kersting; Kristin Kroker; Johannes Steinhard; Isabell Hoernig-Franz; Ute Wesselmann; Katharina Luedorff; Patricia Ohrmann; Volker Arolt; Thomas Suslow
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Importance of high response rates in traumatic stress research.

Authors:  L Weisaeth
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

10.  Abortion, substance abuse and mental health in early adulthood: Thirteen-year longitudinal evidence from the United States.

Authors:  Donald Paul Sullins
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-09-23
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Affective and Substance Abuse Disorders Following Abortion by Pregnancy Intention in the United States: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Donald Paul Sullins
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.