Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.

Literature DB >> 10915111

Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.

S Barton.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2000 PMID： 10915111 PMCID： PMC1118259 DOI： 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.255

Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ ISSN： 0959-8138

× No keyword cloud information.

10 in total

1. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

Authors: J Concato; N Shah; R I Horwitz
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245

2. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.

Authors: K Benson; A J Hartz
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245

3. Randomized trials or observational tribulations?

Authors: S J Pocock; D R Elbourne
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245

4. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.

Authors: R Kunz; A D Oxman
Journal: BMJ Date: 1998-10-31

Review 5. Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.

Authors: A Britton; M McKee; N Black; K McPherson; C Sanderson; C Bain
Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.014

6. Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors: T C Chalmers; R J Matta; H Smith; A M Kunzler
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1977-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245

7. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors: D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal: BMJ Date: 1996-01-13

8. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?

Authors: P C Gøtzsche; O Olsen
Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-01-08 Impact factor: 79.321

9. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group.

Authors: S Hulley; D Grady; T Bush; C Furberg; D Herrington; B Riggs; E Vittinghoff
Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-08-19 Impact factor: 56.272

10. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials.

Authors: H Sacks; T C Chalmers; H Smith
Journal: Am J Med Date: 1982-02 Impact factor: 4.965

10 in total

87 in total

1. Taking STOX: developing a cross disciplinary methodology for systematic reviews of research on the built environment and the health of the public.

Authors: N Weaver; J L Williams; A L Weightman; H N Kitcher; J M F Temple; P Jones; S Palmer
Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.710

9. Utilizing non-traditional research designs to explore culture-specific risk factors for eating disorders in African American adolescents.

Authors: Omni Cassidy; Tracy Sbrocco; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
Journal: Adv Eat Disord Date: 2015-01

10. Point-counterpoint. The triumph of the null hypothesis: epidemiology in an age of change.

Authors: Wasim Maziak
Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 7.196

Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.

1. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

2. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.

3. Randomized trials or observational tribulations?

4. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.

Review 5. Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.

6. Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction.

7. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

8. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?

9. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group.

10. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials.

1. Taking STOX: developing a cross disciplinary methodology for systematic reviews of research on the built environment and the health of the public.

2. Observational research in the evidence based environment: eclipsed by the randomised controlled trial?

3. The quality of research in sports journals.

Review 4. Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines.

5. Cochrane Reviews: new blocks on the kids.

6. The best type of trial.

Review 7. Assessing the use of retrospective databases in conducting economic evaluations of drugs: the case of asthma.

8. Limits of evidence-based surgery.

9. Utilizing non-traditional research designs to explore culture-specific risk factors for eating disorders in African American adolescents.

10. Point-counterpoint. The triumph of the null hypothesis: epidemiology in an age of change.