Literature DB >> 15184313

The best type of trial.

Michal R Pijak, Frantisek Gazdik, Stefan Hrusovsky.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15184313      PMCID： PMC419747          DOI： 10.1503/cmaj.1040454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN： 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

Authors:  J Concato; N Shah; R I Horwitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Discrepancies among megatrials.

Authors:  T A Furukawa; D L Streiner; S Hori
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.

Authors:  S Barton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

4.  Why don't we initiate more large simple randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  James M Wright
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  ALLHAT, or the soft science of the secondary end point.

Authors:  Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Fundamental deficiencies in the megatrial methodology.

Authors:  Bruce G Charlton
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Setting limits in clinical medicine.

Authors:  D J Murphy; G J Povar; L G Pawlson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-03-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.