Literature DB >> 9793791

Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.

A Britton1, M McKee, N Black, K McPherson, C Sanderson, C Bain.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9793791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


× No keyword cloud information.
  44 in total

1.  Building evidence on chronic disease in old age. Standardised assessments and databases offer one way of building the evidence.

Authors:  G I Carpenter; R Bernabei; J P Hirdes; V Mor; K Steel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-26

Review 2.  Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies.

Authors:  M McKee; A Britton; N Black; K McPherson; C Sanderson; C Bain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

3.  The risk of bias from omitted research.

Authors:  S Garattini; A Liberati
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

4.  Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.

Authors:  S Barton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

5.  Taking STOX: developing a cross disciplinary methodology for systematic reviews of research on the built environment and the health of the public.

Authors:  N Weaver; J L Williams; A L Weightman; H N Kitcher; J M F Temple; P Jones; S Palmer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Not-so-surprising findings.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  It's time to choose the study design!: net benefit analysis of alternative study designs to acquire information for evaluation of health technologies.

Authors:  Oren Shavit; Moshe Leshno; Assaf Goldberger; Amir Shmueli; Amnon Hoffman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy.

Authors:  Jon Nicholl
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.

Authors:  Patrick L Ergina; Jonathan A Cook; Jane M Blazeby; Isabelle Boutron; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Barnaby C Reeves; Christoph M Seiler; Douglas G Altman; Jeffrey K Aronson; Jeffrey S Barkun; W Bruce Campbell; Jonathan A Cook; Liane S Feldman; David R Flum; Paul Glasziou; Guy J Maddern; John C Marshall; Peter McCulloch; Jon Nicholl; Steven M Strasberg; Jonathan L Meakins; Deborah Ashby; Nick Black; John Bunker; Martin Burton; Marion Campbell; Kalipso Chalkidou; Iain Chalmers; Marc de Leval; Jon Deeks; Adrian Grant; Muir Gray; Roger Greenhalgh; Milos Jenicek; Sean Kehoe; Richard Lilford; Peter Littlejohns; Yoon Loke; Rajan Madhock; Kim McPherson; Peter Rothwell; Bill Summerskill; David Taggart; Parris Tekkis; Matthew Thompson; Tom Treasure; Ulrich Trohler; Jan Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Template for developing guidelines for the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of psychophysiological interventions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2002-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.