Literature DB >> 10914361

High rate atrial tachyarrhythmia detections in implantable pulse generators: low incidence of false-positive detections. The PA Clinical Trial Investigators.

S M Fitts1, M R Hill, R Mehra, A M Gillis.   

Abstract

Some newer pulse generators have enhanced diagnostic features that provide information on the frequency, date, time of onset, and duration of atrial and/or ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the sensitivity and specificity of device-based atrial tachyarrhythmia detections may vary and depend, in part, on lead position and selected programming parameters. The prevalence of inappropriate detections of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was investigated in 97 patients who received a Thera DR pacemaker 3 months prior to a planned AV node ablation. Patients were randomized to no atrial or to rate adaptive atrial pacing therapy and followed for 3 months. Following a total AV node ablation, patients were randomized to DDDR versus VDD pacing and followed for 1 year. The high rate atrial episode diagnostic feature was used for detection of PAF and the diagnostic data were retrieved during follow-up visits. Criteria were developed to identify oversensing due to near-field P wave detections, far-field R wave detections, or competitive atrial pacing as causes of false-positive atrial tachyarrhythmia detections. A total of 1,636 detections of PAF were recorded in patients preablation. Only 48 episodes (2.9%) were characterized as false-positive detections; 25 episodes (1.5%) were classified as oversensing, and 23 episodes (1.4%) were classified as competitive atrial pacing. A total of 3,061 detections of PAF were recorded postablation. Only four episodes (0.1%) were classified as oversensing. Thus, the diagnostic atrial tachyarrhythmia detection feature in newer pacemakers is an effective method for evaluating the time course of PAF in patients with implantable pulse generators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10914361     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00905.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

Review 1.  A reappraisal of pacemaker timing cycles pertaining to automatic mode switching.

Authors:  R X Stroobandt; S S Barold; F D Vandenbulcke; R J Willems; A F Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Diagnostic tools for atrial tachyarrhythmias in implantable pacemakers: a review of technical options and pitfalls.

Authors:  W G de Voogt; N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Effect of atrial tachyarrhythmia duration on percentage of time with atrial pacing in pacemaker patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Andreas Schuchert; Gaby Frost; Thomas Meinertz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Preventricular far-field sensing in the atrial channel of dual chamber pacemakers--an occasional cause of inappropriate mode switch.

Authors:  Christof Kolb; Selim Aratma; Bernhard Zrenner; Claus Schmitt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Use of an atrial lead with very short tip-to-ring spacing avoids oversensing of far-field R-wave.

Authors:  Christof Kolb; Georg Nölker; Carsten Lennerz; Hansmartin Jetter; Verena Semmler; Klaus Pürner; Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Tilko Reents; Klaus Lang; Ulrich Lotze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers - do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?

Authors:  Michal Chudzik; Artur Klimczak; Jerzy Krzysztof Wranicz
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.