Literature DB >> 10913895

Mandated coverage for cancer-screening services: whose guidelines do states follow?

S S Rathore1, J D McGreevey, K A Schulman, D Atkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and nature of state coverage mandates for cancer screening.
METHODS: We contacted insurance departments in 50 states, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico for copies of state codes that mandate coverage of screening for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer by private insurers. We further compared mandates, when identified, with American Cancer Society (ACS) and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for likely sources of screening recommendations.
RESULTS: Forty-three states and the District of Columbia currently mandate coverage of cancer screening. Breast cancer-screening coverage was most frequently mandated (n =44), followed by cervical (n =22), prostate (n =18), and colorectal cancer screening (n =1). Twenty-three states used ACS guidelines only, 18 states used ACS and non-ACS/non-USPSTF guidelines, and 3 states used only non-ACS/non-USPSTF guidelines in development of coverage mandates. No state screening coverage mandate reflected USPSTF-screening guidelines. Of 85 mandates in place, 57 have been passed since 1990.
CONCLUSIONS: Although state mandates for insurer coverage of cancer screening are common and increasing, we found noticeable inter- and intra-state variation in coverage, selection, and use of screening guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10913895     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00179-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  9 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of mandated benefit laws, 1949-2002.

Authors:  Miriam J Laugesen; Rebecca R Paul; Harold S Luft; Wade Aubry; Theodore G Ganiats
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Lessons from state mandates of preventive cancer screenings.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Bryan Dowd; Jean Abraham
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Effects of State Cervical Cancer Insurance Mandates on Pap Test Rates.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Christopher S Carpenter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  When Guidelines Conflict: A Case Study of Mammography Screening Initiation in the 1990s.

Authors:  Mireille Jacobson; Srikanth Kadiyala
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-09-19

5.  Underuse of screening sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in a large cohort of US adults.

Authors:  Ann Chao; Cari J Connell; Vilma Cokkinides; Eric J Jacobs; Eugenia E Calle; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The role of family history of cancer on cervical cancer screening behavior in a population-based survey of women in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Jessica D Bellinger; Heather M Brandt; James W Hardin; Shalanda A Bynum; Patricia A Sharpe; Dawnyéa Jackson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-05-27

7.  Mis-SHAPEing public health policy.

Authors:  Erica S Spatz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-09-22

8.  Autism spectrum disorder, politics, and the generosity of insurance mandates in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy Callaghan; Steven Sylvester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Are U.S. cancer screening test patterns consistent with guideline recommendations with respect to the age of screening initiation?

Authors:  Srikanth Kadiyala
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.