Literature DB >> 16704673

A comparative analysis of mandated benefit laws, 1949-2002.

Miriam J Laugesen1, Rebecca R Paul, Harold S Luft, Wade Aubry, Theodore G Ganiats.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand and compare the trends in mandated benefits laws in the United States. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Mandated benefit laws enacted in 50 states and the District of Columbia for the period 1949-2002 were compiled from multiple published compendia. STUDY
DESIGN: Laws that require private insurers and health plans to cover particular services, types of diseases, or care by specific providers in 50 states and the District of Columbia are compared for the period 1949-2002. Legislation is compared by year, by average and total frequency, by state, by type (provider, health care service, or preventive), and according to whether it requires coverage or an offer of coverage. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHOD: Data from published tables were entered into a spreadsheet and analyzed using statistical software. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A total of 1,471 laws mandated coverage for 76 types of providers and services. The most common type of mandated coverage is for specific health care services (670 laws for 34 different services), followed by laws for services offered by specific professionals and other providers (507 mandated benefits laws for 25 types of providers), and coverage for specific preventive services (295 laws for 17 benefits). On average, a mandated benefit law has been adopted or significantly revised by 19 states, and each state has approximately 29 mandates. Only two benefits (minimum maternity stay and breast reconstruction) are mandated in all 51 jurisdictions and these were also federally mandated benefits. The mean number of total mandated benefit laws adopted or significantly revised per year was 17 per year in the 1970s, 36 per year in the 1980s, 59 per year in the 1990s, and 76 per year between 2000 and 2002. Since 1990, mandate adoption increased substantially, with around 55 percent of all mandated benefit laws enacted between 1990 and 2002.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a large increase in the number of mandated benefits laws during the managed care "backlash" of the 1990s. Many states now use mandated benefits to prescribe not only what services and benefits would be provided but how, where, and when services will be provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16704673      PMCID: PMC1713218          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00521.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  39 in total

1.  State mental health parity laws: cause or consequence of differences in use?

Authors:  R Sturm; R L Pacula
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Mission unfulfilled: potholes on the road to mental health parity.

Authors:  D Mechanic; D D McAlpine
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Datapoints: mental health parity and employer-sponsored health insurance in 1999-2000: II. Copayments and coinsurance.

Authors:  R L Pacula; R Sturm
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Infant mortality and early postpartum discharge.

Authors:  J D Malkin; S Garber; M S Broder; E Keeler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  State parity legislation and changes in health insurance and perceived access to care among individuals with mental illness: 1996-1998*

Authors:  Roland Sturm
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2000-12-01

6.  The impact of legislation and secular trends on newborn length of stay for Medicaid infants in Ohio.

Authors:  Uma R Kotagal; Pamela J Schoettker; Harry D Atherton; Donna Bush; Richard W Hornung
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Effects of a law against early postpartum discharge on newborn follow-up, adverse events, and HMO expenditures.

Authors:  Jeanne M Madden; Stephen B Soumerai; Tracy A Lieu; Kenneth D Mandl; Fang Zhang; Dennis Ross-Degnan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  The politics of "Drive-through deliveries": putting early postpartum discharge on the legislative agenda.

Authors:  E Declercq; D Simmes
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Job loss due to health insurance mandates.

Authors:  J A Klerman; D P Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Do longer postpartum stays reduce newborn readmissions? Analysis using instrumental variables.

Authors:  J D Malkin; M S Broder; E Keeler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  7 in total

1.  Health services research as a source of legislative analysis and input: the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program.

Authors:  Thomas R Oliver; Rachel Friedman Singer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Physician support of HPV vaccination school-entry requirements.

Authors:  Sophia Califano; William A Calo; Morris Weinberger; Melissa B Gilkey; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Effects of State Cervical Cancer Insurance Mandates on Pap Test Rates.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Christopher S Carpenter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Insuring against infertility: expanding state infertility mandates to include fertility preservation technology for cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel Basco; Lisa Campo-Engelstein; Sarah Rodriguez
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Acceptability of school requirements for human papillomavirus vaccine.

Authors:  Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Yuli Chang; Nicole Liddon; Sarah Guerry; Erica Pettigrew; Lauri E Markowitz; Sami L Gottlieb
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2011-09

6.  Impact of state mandatory insurance coverage on the use of diabetes preventive care.

Authors:  Rui Li; Ping Zhang; Lawrence Barker; Dekeely Hartsfield
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Autism spectrum disorder, politics, and the generosity of insurance mandates in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy Callaghan; Steven Sylvester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.