Literature DB >> 10912841

Detailed analyses of periarticular osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis.

F E Alenfeld1, E Diessel, M Brezger, J Sieper, D Felsenberg, J Braun.   

Abstract

Periarticular osteopenia is the earliest radiographic sign of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recent studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have indicated that the loss of periarticular BMD can be quantified by whole-hand bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. The aim of this study was to analyze periarticular BMD in more detail by DXA and quantitative ultrasound (QUS). In a cross-sectional study 23 women aged 30-76 years with early RA, mean disease duration 26 +/- 19 months, and 18 men aged 42-69 years, mean disease duration 24 +/- 25 months, were examined. All patients received antirheumatic therapy. The reference population consisted of 103 age-matched controls (68 females, 35 males) and young healthy controls. BMD measurements were performed using a DXA Expert XL densitometer (Lunar). BMD of the whole-hand and two subregions was determined: two subchondral regions of interest (S.CH.) were set within the trabecular bone, distal to the proximal interphalangeal joints of digits II and III excluding the dense subchondral bone of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint and two metacarpal regions of interest (MCP) were set including the entire MCP joint of these fingers. QUS measurements at the proximal phalanges of digits II-V were performed using a DBM Sonic (Igea); amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SoS) was determined. In comparison with whole-hand BMD measurements, bone loss was pronounced in patients with a disease duration of 18-72 months at the subchondral regions of interest in both genders compared with age-matched controls (women: mean BMD loss S.CH. -23%, p<0.001, whole-hand -16%, p<0.001; men: mean BMD loss S.CH. -19%, p < 0.05, whole-hand -12%, p<0.05). The bone changes were also shown by QUS (women: Ad-SOS values of 1950 +/- 90 m/s in RA vs 2137 +/- 35 m/s in young healthy controls (p <0.005); men AD-SOS 1956 +/- 87 m/s in RA vs 2146 +/- 41 m/s in young healthy controls (p <0.05)). These results show that BMD and Ad-SOS values are significantly lowered in patients with early RA and indicate that periarticular osteoporosis in early RA might possibly be better detected using detailed hand scan analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10912841     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  29 in total

1.  Trends and Determinants of Osteoporosis Treatment and Screening in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gulsen Ozen; Diane L Kamen; Ted R Mikuls; Bryant R England; Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Use of digital x ray radiogrammetry in the assessment of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W B Jawaid; D Crosbie; J Shotton; D M Reid; A Stewart
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Computerized digital imaging techniques provided by digital X-ray radiogrammetry as new diagnostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Joachim Böttcher; Alexander Pfeil; Anders Rosholm; Max-Ludwig Schäfer; Ansgar Malich; Alexander Petrovitch; Bettina Seidl; Gabriele Lehmann; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Gert Hein; Gunter Wolf; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  [Value of fall-risk tests for patients with rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  H-C Schober; K Maass; C Maass; E C Reisinger; G Schröder; C Kneitz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Multi-site quantitative ultrasound compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in rheumatoid arthritis: effects of body mass index and inflamed soft tissue on reproducibility.

Authors:  A Pfeil; J Böttcher; H J Mentzel; G Lehmann; M L Schäfer; A Kramer; A Petrovitch; B E Seidl; A Malich; G Hein; G Wolf; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 6.  Hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Gamze Kilic; Salih Ozgocmen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

7.  Is hand bone mineral density a marker for hand function in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis? The correlation among bone mineral density of the hand, radiological findings and hand function.

Authors:  Beril Dogu; Banu Kuran; Figen Yilmaz; Ahmet Usen; Hulya Sirzai
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices.

Authors:  O R Madsen; C Suetta; C Egsmose; J S Lorentzen; O H Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Hand bone densitometry: a more sensitive standard for the assessment of early bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Glenn Haugeberg; Michael J Green; Philip G Conaghan; Mark Quinn; Richard Wakefield; Susanna M Proudman; Sheena Stewart; Elizabeth Hensor; Paul Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  [Bone densitometry in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Characteristics of the measurement site and disease-specific factors].

Authors:  H Franck; J Braun; F Buttgereit; W Demary; G Hein; J Kekow; G Schett; P M Kern
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.