Literature DB >> 10912352

Modelling of chronic wound healing dynamics.

D Cukjati1, S Rebersek, R Karba, D Miklavcic.   

Abstract

Following chronic wound area over time can give a general overview of wound healing dynamics. Decrease or increase in wound area over time has been modelled using either exponential or linear models, which are two-parameter mathematical models. In many cases of chronic wound healing, a delay of healing process was noticed. Such dynamics cannot be described solely with two parameters. The reported study deals with two-, three-, and four-parameter models. Assessment of the models was based on weekly measurements of 226 chronic wounds of various aetiologies. Several quantitative fitting criteria, i.e. goodness of fit, handling missing data and prediction capability, and qualitative criteria, i.e. number of parameters and their biophysical meaning were considered. The median of goodness of fit of three- and four-parameter models was between 0.937 and 0.958, and the median of two-parameter models was 0.821 to 0.883. Two-parameter models fitted wound area over time significantly (p = 0.01) worse than three- and four-parameter models. The criterion handling missing data provided similar results, with no significant difference between three- and four-parameter models. Median prediction error of two-parameter models was between 111 and 746; three-parameter models resulted in an error of 64 to 128, and finally four-parameter models resulted in the highest prediction error of 407 and 238. Based on the values of quantitative fitting criteria obtained, three parameters were chosen as the most appropriate. Based on qualitative criteria, the delayed exponential model was selected as the most general three-parameter model. It was found to have good prediction capability and in this capacity it could be used to help physicians choose the most appropriate treatment for patients with chronic wounds after an initial three-week observation period, when the median error increase of fitting is 74%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10912352     DOI: 10.1007/BF02347056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   3.079


  15 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of chronic wounds by means of electric and electromagnetic fields. Part 1. Literature review.

Authors:  L Vodovnik; R Karba
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Quantitative analysis of wound healing.

Authors:  W G Bardsley; A Sattar; J R Armstrong; M Shah; P Brosnan; M W Ferguson
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  1995 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation for dermal wound healing.

Authors:  G D Gentzkow; K H Miller
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.231

Review 4.  Wound healing.

Authors:  H Waldorf; J Fewkes
Journal:  Adv Dermatol       Date:  1995

Review 5.  Using cluster analysis to develop a healing typology in vascular ulcers.

Authors:  M Johnson
Journal:  J Vasc Nurs       Date:  1997-06

6.  Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers.

Authors:  L L Baker; R Chambers; S K DeMuth; F Villar
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Chronic dermal ulcer healing enhanced with monophasic pulsed electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J A Feedar; L C Kloth; G D Gentzkow
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1991-09

8.  Using principal component analysis to describe wound status.

Authors:  A A Bartolucci; D R Thomas
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Healing rates of plantar ulcers in leprosy and diabetes.

Authors:  J A Birke; A Novick; C A Patout; W C Coleman
Journal:  Lepr Rev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 0.537

10.  Electrical nerve stimulation improves healing of diabetic ulcers.

Authors:  T C Lundeberg; S V Eriksson; M Malm
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in the prediction of chronic wound healing by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D Cukjati; M Robnik-Sikonja; S Rebersek; I Kononenko; D Miklavcic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Low-level laser therapy on the treatment of oral and cutaneous pemphigus vulgaris: case report.

Authors:  Eliana Maria Minicucci; Hélio Amante Miot; Silvia Regina Catharino Sartori Barraviera; Luciana Almeida-Lopes
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Mathematical models of wound healing and closure: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Stephanie N Jorgensen; Jonathan R Sanders
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Topical steroids for chronic wounds displaying abnormal inflammation.

Authors:  D C Bosanquet; A Rangaraj; A J Richards; A Riddell; V M Saravolac; K G Harding
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A reliable method of determining wound healing rate.

Authors:  D Cukjati; S Rebersek; D Miklavcic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.079

6.  Model-Based Analysis Reveals a Sustained and Dose-Dependent Acceleration of Wound Healing by VEGF-A mRNA (AZD8601).

Authors:  Joachim Almquist; S Michaela Rikard; Maria Wågberg; Anthony C Bruce; Peter Gennemark; Regina Fritsche-Danielson; Kenneth R Chien; Shayn M Peirce; Kenny Hansson; Anna Lundahl
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-05

7.  Photo-stimulatory effect of low energy helium-neon laser irradiation on excisional diabetic wound healing dynamics in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Arun G Maiya; Pramod Kumar; Shivanand Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Nonlinear modeling of venous leg ulcer healing rates.

Authors:  Matthew Cardinal; Tania Phillips; David E Eisenbud; Keith Harding; Jonathan Mansbridge; David G Armstrong
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2009-03-31

9.  Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity.

Authors:  Richard Hillson Bull; Karen Louise Staines; Agnes Juguilon Collarte; Duncan Shirreffs Bain; Nicola M Ivins; Keith Gordon Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.