Literature DB >> 1466529

Electrical nerve stimulation improves healing of diabetic ulcers.

T C Lundeberg1, S V Eriksson, M Malm.   

Abstract

A controlled study of the effects of electrical nerve stimulation (ENS) was performed in conjunction with a standard treatment for healing chronic diabetic ulcers on 64 patients divided randomly into two groups. All patients received standard treatment (paste-impregnated bandage and a self-adhesive elastic bandage) plus placebo ENS or ENS (alternating constant current; frequency, 80 Hz; pulse width, 1 msec; intensity-evoking strong paresthesias) for 20 minutes twice daily for 12 weeks. Comparison of percentages of healed ulcer area and the number of healed ulcers was made after 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in both ulcer area and healed ulcers in the ENS group compared with the placebo group after 12 weeks of treatment. The results of the present study support the use of ENS in diabetic ulcers. ENS is easy to apply and can be used by the patient at home following instructions from a medical doctor or a therapist experienced in electrical stimulation and the treatment of ulcers. Additional studies are needed to identify the mechanisms involved in the promotion of ulcer healing with electrical stimulation and to determine the stimulus variables that most efficaciously accelerate tissue repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1466529     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199210000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  18 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysical therapy for managing diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel L-C Kwan; Gladys L-Y Cheing; Sinfia K-S Vong; Sing K Lo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Does physical therapy and rehabilitation improve outcomes for diabetic foot ulcers?

Authors:  Yasemin Turan; Bulent M Ertugrul; Benjamin A Lipsky; Kevser Bayraktar
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-20

Review 3.  Clinical Trials Involving Biphasic Pulsed Current, MicroCurrent, and/or Low-Intensity Direct Current.

Authors:  Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  Leila Yazdanpanah; Morteza Nasiri; Sara Adarvishi
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-02-15

5.  Effective treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy by high-frequency external muscle stimulation.

Authors:  L Reichstein; S Labrenz; D Ziegler; S Martin
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 6.  The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on tissue repair: A literature review.

Authors:  Aline Fernanda Perez Machado; Eduardo Ferreira Santana; Pascale Mutti Tacani; Richard Eloin Liebano
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Nanomaterials and synergistic low-intensity direct current (LIDC) stimulation technology for orthopedic implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Rohan A Shirwaiker; Meghan E Samberg; Paul H Cohen; Richard A Wysk; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-01-17

Review 8.  Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Siwei Zhao; Abijeet Singh Mehta; Min Zhao
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  A reliable method of determining wound healing rate.

Authors:  D Cukjati; S Rebersek; D Miklavcic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Modelling of chronic wound healing dynamics.

Authors:  D Cukjati; S Rebersek; R Karba; D Miklavcic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.