Literature DB >> 1881954

Chronic dermal ulcer healing enhanced with monophasic pulsed electrical stimulation.

J A Feedar1, L C Kloth, G D Gentzkow.   

Abstract

The purposes of this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study were to compare healing of chronic dermal ulcers treated with pulsed electrical stimulation with healing of similar wounds treated with sham electrical stimulation and to evaluate patient tolerance to the therapeutic protocol. Forty-seven patients, aged 29 to 91 years, with 50 stage II, III, and IV ulcers were randomly assigned to either a treatment group (n = 26) or a control (sham treatment) group (n = 24). Treated wounds received 30 minutes of pulsed cathodal electrical stimulation twice daily at a pulse frequency of 128 pulses per second (pps) and a peak amplitude of 29.2 mA if the wound contained necrotic tissue or any drainage that was not serosanguinous. A saline-moistened nontreatment electrode was applied 30.5 cm (12 in) cephalad from the wound. This protocol was continued for 3 days after the wound was debrided or exhibited serosanguinous drainage. Thereafter, the polarity of the treatment electrode on the wound was changed every 3 days until the wound progressed to a stage II classification. The pulse frequency was then reduced to 64 pps, and the treatment electrode polarity was changed daily until the wound was healed. Patients in the control group were treated with the same protocol, except they received sham electrical stimulation. After 4 weeks, wounds in the treatment and control groups were 44% and 67% of their initial size, respectively. The healing rates per week for the treatment and control groups were 14% and 8.25%, respectively. The results of this study indicate that pulsed electrical stimulation has a beneficial effect on healing stage II, III, and IV chronic dermal ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1881954     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/71.9.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  25 in total

1.  Augmentation of venous, arterial and microvascular blood supply in the leg by isometric neuromuscular stimulation via the peroneal nerve.

Authors:  At Tucker; A Maass; Ds Bain; L-H Chen; M Azzam; H Dawson; A Johnston
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2010

2.  Noninvasive evaluation of electrical stimulation impacts on muscle hemodynamics via integrating diffuse optical spectroscopies with muscle stimulator.

Authors:  Yu Shang; Yu Lin; Brad A Henry; Ran Cheng; Chong Huang; Li Chen; Brent J Shelton; Karin R Swartz; Sara S Salles; Guoqiang Yu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Electrical stimulation of schwann cells promotes sustained increases in neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  Abigail N Koppes; Andrea L Nordberg; Gina M Paolillo; Nicole M Goodsell; Haley A Darwish; Linxia Zhang; Deanna M Thompson
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Does physical therapy and rehabilitation improve outcomes for diabetic foot ulcers?

Authors:  Yasemin Turan; Bulent M Ertugrul; Benjamin A Lipsky; Kevser Bayraktar
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-20

Review 5.  Electrical Stimulation Technologies for Wound Healing.

Authors:  Luther C Kloth
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Clinical Trials Involving Biphasic Pulsed Current, MicroCurrent, and/or Low-Intensity Direct Current.

Authors:  Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Electrostimulation: Current Status, Strength of Evidence Guidelines, and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gerard Koel; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Feasibility of an electrostimulation system treatment for wound healing: a case series of patients with chronic ulcers in Barbados.

Authors:  Nkemcho Ojeh; Angela Rose; Selma Jackman; Morvillia Applewhaite; Veronica Webster
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 9.  Nanomaterials and synergistic low-intensity direct current (LIDC) stimulation technology for orthopedic implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Rohan A Shirwaiker; Meghan E Samberg; Paul H Cohen; Richard A Wysk; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-01-17

Review 10.  Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Siwei Zhao; Abijeet Singh Mehta; Min Zhao
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.