Literature DB >> 10911789

The need for the moving junction in craniospinal irradiation.

A E Kiltie1, J M Povall, R E Taylor.   

Abstract

The moving junction is used in craniospinal irradiation (CSI) to smooth out any dose inhomogeneity across the head/spine junction. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the extent of the head/spine junction inhomogeneity in treatment plans of actual patients and to compare stationary and moving junction data. The radiotherapy plans, prescriptions and case notes of 18 patients (12 medulloblastomas, 3 supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumours, 2 pineoblastomas and 1 pineal germinoma) treated with CSI (35 Gy in 21 fractions over 29 days) were examined. At 16 months median follow-up (range 1.5-35.5 months), no junctional recurrences or myelopathy were observed. Using the moving junction technique the mean maximum anterior cord dose, from 5 cm caudal to 3 cm cephalad of the Day 1 junction, was 36.3 Gy, and the mean minimum anterior cord dose was 32.9 Gy, with a mean within-patient variation of 3.4 Gy (9.7% of 35 Gy). In four patients, comparison of dose variation across the field junction was made between the original plans and a re-plan using a stationary junction. The effect of a matched junction, a 2 mm overlap and a 2 mm gap were studied both for moving junction and stationary junction techniques. Dose variations were similar in all cases for exactly-matched fields, but for a 2 mm overlap or gap the dose variation was smaller in all but one case for the moving junction technique. These data suggest that the moving junction is important to minimize the risk of overdose or underdose across the spine/head junction in CSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10911789     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.870.10911789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Reducing the dosimetric impact of positional errors in field junctions for craniospinal irradiation using VMAT.

Authors:  Andrej Strojnik; Ignasi Méndez; Primož Peterlin
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-28

2.  A simple planning technique of craniospinal irradiation in the eclipse treatment planning system.

Authors:  Hemalatha Athiyaman; Athiyaman Mayilvaganan; Daleep Singh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-10

3.  An image-guided technique for planning and verification of supine craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Ryan L McMahon; Nicole A Larrier; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy for central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Sanziana R I Schiopu; Gregor Habl; Matthias Häfner; Sonja Katayama; Klaus Herfarth; Juergen Debus; Florian Sterzing
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 5.  Total marrow irradiation for hematopoietic malignancies using volumetric modulated arc therapy: A review of treatment planning studies.

Authors:  Pietro Mancosu; Luca Cozzi; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-29

6.  Modified volumetric modulated arc therapy technique with reduced planning and treatment time for craniospinal irradiation utilising two isocentres.

Authors:  Minh Nguyen; Thu Dang; Liz Deegan; Kelsie Henry; Scott Jones; Andrew Pullar; Robyn Cheuk; Adrian Gibbs; Lucy Sim; Catriona Hargrave
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2022-04-22

7.  Impact of setup errors on multi-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Yongqiang Zhou; Yao Ai; Ce Han; Xiaomin Zheng; Jinling Yi; Congying Xie; Xiance Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.243

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.