Literature DB >> 10911573

Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

E al-Mizyen1, L Sabatini, A M Lower, C M Wilson, T al-Shawaf, J G Grudzinskas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women undergoing in vitro fertilization with low ovarian reserve and poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) present a management dilemma. In a retrospective observational study, we compared the pretreatment use of the gestogen medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg twice daily from day 15 of the cycle for a minimum of 2 weeks) with an oral contraceptive pill (one tablet daily from day 4 of the cycle for a minimum of 3 weeks).
METHODS: The criteria for inclusion in the study included one or more of the following: abandoned cycles due to poor response, fewer than four oocytes retrieved following a standard COH protocol, age > 39 years, and elevated basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Thirty-eight women received pretreatment with gestogen, and a similar number of women received pretreatment with the pill. The flare protocol was used in all treatment cycles combined with an individualized dose of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) (4-8 ampoules/day of 75 units FSH/ampoule) depending on previous response, age, and early follicular serum FSH level. Both groups were similar in mean age, duration of infertility, early follicular FSH levels, and the distribution of various aetiologies.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine cycles were abandoned before oocyte retrieval, 15 (39.5%) in the pill group and 14 (36.8%) in the gestogen group, because of an inadequate ovarian response. The mean (+/- SD) number of ampoules (75 IU FSH/ampoule) of hMG used per cycle was similar in the pill and gestogen groups (59.7 +/- 19.3 vs. 70.2 +/- 29.4, respectively). There also was no difference seen in the numbers of oocytes retrieved (4.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.2 +/- 2.5), total number of embryos (2.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 2.2 +/- 1.1), or the number of embryos transferred (1.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0) in the pill and gestogen groups, respectively. One pregnancy in each group resulted following embryo transfer in 22 women in the pill group and in 24 women in the gestogen group.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that pre-IVF treatment with oral contraceptive pill or gestogen combined with the flare protocol in women at high risk of or with a history of poor ovarian response, as defined in this study, did not appear to result in an improvement in outcome of IVF-embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10911573      PMCID: PMC3455662          DOI: 10.1023/a:1009462004650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  38 in total

1.  Limited success using the "flare" protocol in poor responders in cycles with low basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels during in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  V Karande; R Morris; J Rinehart; C Miller; R Rao; N Gleicher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy combined with high-dose gonadotropin stimulation yields favorable pregnancy results in low responders.

Authors:  B M Faber; J Mayer; B Cox; D Jones; J P Toner; S Oehninger; S J Muasher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation.

Authors:  S D Keay; N H Liversedge; R S Mathur; J M Jenkins
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-05

4.  Follicular density in ovarian biopsy of infertile women: a novel method to assess ovarian reserve.

Authors:  A Lass; R Silye; D C Abrams; T Krausz; O Hovatta; R Margara; R M Winston
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  The program for in vitro fertilization at Norfolk.

Authors:  H W Jones; G S Jones; M C Andrews; A Acosta; C Bundren; J Garcia; B Sandow; L Veeck; C Wilkes; J Witmyer; J E Wortham; G Wright
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Recruitment of follicles by recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone commencing in the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle.

Authors:  L Rombauts; A M Suikkari; V MacLachlan; A O Trounson; D L Healy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Non-response to ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic, normogonadal women: a clinical sign of impending onset of ovarian failure pre-empting the rise in basal follicle stimulating hormone levels.

Authors:  J Farhi; R Homburg; A Ferber; R Orvieto; Z Ben Rafael
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response.

Authors:  A Lass; J Skull; E McVeigh; R Margara; R M Winston
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Prognostic assessment of female fecundity.

Authors:  D Navot; Z Rosenwaks; E J Margalioth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-09-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Effect of smoking on ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  A El-Nemr; T Al-Shawaf; L Sabatini; C Wilson; A M Lower; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Oral contraceptive pretreatment does not improve outcome in microdose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol among poor responder intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients.

Authors:  Candan Iltemir Duvan; Bulent Berker; Nilgun Ozturk Turhan; Hakan Satiroglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Poor ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Padma Rekha Jirge
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.