Literature DB >> 9130896

Limited success using the "flare" protocol in poor responders in cycles with low basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels during in vitro fertilization.

V Karande1, R Morris, J Rinehart, C Miller, R Rao, N Gleicher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess an alternate protocol for stimulating poor responders.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical study.
SETTING: University-affiliated infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Eighty poor responders. INTERVENTION(S): Stimulation was withheld until patients fulfilled the following criteria: basal FSH < or = 12 mIU/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 1.00) with concurrent E2 level < or = 100 pg/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 3.671), and P level < or = 1.0 ng/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 3.467). They then started leuprolide acetate on cycle day 2 and a high dose of gonadotropins on cycle day 3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Stimulation response and pregnancy rates (PRs). RESULT(S): Nineteen cycles (23.8%) were canceled because of poor ovarian response. The mean E2 level on day of hCG was 2,578 +/- 1,339 pg/mL (9,464 +/- 4,915 pmol/L) (range, 789 to 5934 pg/mL [2,896 to 21,784 pmol/L]). The number of oocytes retrieved was 10 +/- 6.6 (range, 1 to 37). Nine patients did not have ET (failed fertilization [n = 5], no cleavage of preembryos [n = 3], freeze all [n = 1]). The number of pre-embryos transferred was 3.9 +/- 1.6 (range, 1 to 8). The clinical pregnancy rate was 7 of 61 (11.5%) per retrieval, and 7 of 52 (13.4%) per transfer with an implantation rate of 7 of 201 (3.5%). Three patients miscarried with an ongoing PR of 4 of 61 (6.5%) per retrieval and 4 of 52 (7.6%) per transfer. CONCLUSION(S): Poor responders undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with the "flare" protocol in cycles with low basal FSH will often show adequate ovarian response and reach oocyte retrieval and ET. The PRs, however, remain low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9130896     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81403-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

1.  Cessation of low-dose gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist therapy followed by high-dose gonadotropin stimulation yields a favorable ovarian response in poor responders.

Authors:  Pu-Tsui Wang; Robert Kuo-kuang Lee; Jin-Tsung Su; Jen-Wan Hou; Ming-Huei Lin; Yu-Ming Hu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  "Co-Flare" stimulation in the poor responder patient: predictive value of the flare response.

Authors:  S Spandorfer; J Navarro; L M Kump; H C Liu; O K Davis; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Hypothalamic-pituitary suppression with oral contraceptive pills does not improve outcome in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  P Kovacs; P E Barg; B R Witt
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

Authors:  E al-Mizyen; L Sabatini; A M Lower; C M Wilson; T al-Shawaf; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Evaluation and treatment of low responders in assisted reproductive technology: a challenge to meet.

Authors:  S J Fasouliotis; A Simon; N Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Enhancing the fertility of poor responders by treatment with estrogen rebound combined with a short protocol.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Yokota; Mikako Yokota; Hidemi Yokota; Masami Makita; Setsuko Sato; Yasuhisa Araki
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2003-09-26

8.  Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status.

Authors:  Marcílio Nichi; Rita de Cassia Sávio Figueira; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda Souza Setti; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Rosalie Cabry-Goubet; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Aviva Devaux; Naima Belhadri-Mansouri; Henri Copin; Moncef Benkhalifa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Strategies for Pituitary Down-regulation to Optimize IVF/ICSI Outcome in Poor Ovarian Responders.

Authors:  Ahmed Badawy; Alaa Wageah; Mohamed El Gharib; Ezz Eldin Osman
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.