Literature DB >> 9548155

Recruitment of follicles by recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone commencing in the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle.

L Rombauts1, A M Suikkari, V MacLachlan, A O Trounson, D L Healy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate, in patients who previously had a suboptimal ovarian stimulation cycle, the benefit of starting ovarian stimulation before the onset of menses.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: A tertiary referral center for infertility treatment. PATIENT(S): Forty patients undergoing IVF or GIFT from whom only 3-6 oocytes were retrieved in their last cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Recombinant human FSH was administered before the onset of the menstrual period (experimental group) or in the early follicular phase after the onset of menses (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number of oocytes retrieved. RESULT(S): Patients in the experimental group were ready for oocyte retrieval on menstrual cycle day 11 instead of cycle day 14. The number of oocytes retrieved was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION(S): Poor responders do not benefit from commencing recombinant human FSH therapy in the luteal phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9548155     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00018-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Day 3 embryo transfer may have better pregnancy outcomes in younger than 35-year-old patients with poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Zhi-min Xin; Bin Xu; Hai-xia Jin; Wen-yan Song; Ying-pu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Ovarian manipulation in ART: going beyond physiological standards to provide best clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Israel Ortega; Juan A García-Velasco; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

Authors:  E al-Mizyen; L Sabatini; A M Lower; C M Wilson; T al-Shawaf; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Evaluation and treatment of low responders in assisted reproductive technology: a challenge to meet.

Authors:  S J Fasouliotis; A Simon; N Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Luteal start of exogenous FSH in poor responder women.

Authors:  Tansu Kucuk; Eran Sozen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status.

Authors:  Marcílio Nichi; Rita de Cassia Sávio Figueira; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda Souza Setti; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?

Authors:  John Zhang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new?

Authors:  Filippo Ubaldi; Alberto Vaiarelli; Rosario D'Anna; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Prediction and diagnosis of poor ovarian response: the dilemma.

Authors:  Ahmed Badawy; Alaa Wageah; Mohamed El Gharib; Ezz Eldin Osman
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.