Literature DB >> 10909879

Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear?

L Gaertner1, C A Insko.   

Abstract

H. Tajfel's (1970) minimal group paradigm (MGP) research suggests that social categorization is a sufficient antecedent of ingroup-favoring discrimination. Two experiments examined whether discrimination in the MGP arises from categorization or processes of outcome dependence, that is, ingroup reciprocity and outgroup fear. Experiment 1 unconfounded categorization from outcome dependence. Categorized men discriminated only when dependent on others. Categorized women discriminated regardless of the structure of dependence. Experiment 2 examined dependence on the ingroup versus the outgroup as the locus of male-initiated discrimination. Consistently with an ingroup reciprocity effect, men discriminated when dependent on ingroup, but not outgroup, members. Sex differences are discussed in regard to women's heightened ingroup dependence produced by biological or environmental constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10909879     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  12 in total

1.  Implications for the Self Determine Benevolence and Self-Protection in Intergroup Relations.

Authors:  Thomas E Malloy; Lorin Kinney
Journal:  Self Identity       Date:  2016-10-05

2.  Tracking multiple perspectives: Spontaneous computation of what individuals in high entitative groups see.

Authors:  Xiaoyan He; Yingqiao Yang; Lan Wang; Jun Yin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 3.  Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement.

Authors:  Katherine McAuliffe; Yarrow Dunham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election.

Authors:  David G Rand; Thomas Pfeiffer; Anna Dreber; Rachel W Sheketoff; Nils C Wernerfelt; Yochai Benkler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup Interdependence.

Authors:  Kevin Durrheim; Michael Quayle; Colin G Tredoux; Kim Titlestad; Larry Tooke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.

Authors:  Burak Oc; Celia Moore; Michael R Bashshur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Role of the right temporoparietal junction in intergroup bias in trust decisions.

Authors:  Junya Fujino; Shisei Tei; Takashi Itahashi; Yuta Y Aoki; Haruhisa Ohta; Manabu Kubota; Ryu-Ichiro Hashimoto; Hidehiko Takahashi; Nobumasa Kato; Motoaki Nakamura
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Jumping on the 'bad'wagon? How group membership influences responses to the social exclusion of others.

Authors:  Gert-Jan Lelieveld; Lasana T Harris; Lotte F van Dillen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  How affectively-based and cognitively-based attitudes drive intergroup behaviours: the moderating role of affective-cognitive consistency.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; John Dovidio; Erping Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism.

Authors:  Jim A C Everett; Nadira S Faber; Molly Crockett
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.