Literature DB >> 33469850

Tracking multiple perspectives: Spontaneous computation of what individuals in high entitative groups see.

Xiaoyan He1,2, Yingqiao Yang1,2, Lan Wang1,2, Jun Yin3,4.   

Abstract

Perspective-taking ability is crucial for supporting social interactions. It has been widely suggested that the calculation of an individual's perspective is spontaneous. Nevertheless, people typically engage with more than one individual, and computing what individuals in a crowd see is important. The current study explored whether people spontaneously compute the perspectives of individuals displayed in a crowd. The classic visual perspective-taking task was adopted, but the picture of the room was presented with four human avatars facing two walls. The results showed that if the crowd of individuals was treated as a high entitative group, when none of the perspectives of the individuals contained the same number of discs as that from the perspective of the participant, the judgment of the participant's perspective was slower than when a proportion of the perspectives of the individuals displayed in the crowd were consistent with the participant's perspective, even if the perspectives of the multiple individuals in a crowd were not explicitly noticed. This altercentric intrusion effect was not present when the crowd had low entitativity. These findings were replicated by using different methods to operationalize group entitativity. Hence, this study demonstrates that spontaneously tracking the perspectives of individuals displayed in a crowd has a boundary condition and that people can spontaneously compute what individuals in high entitative groups see.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entitativity; Groups; Perspective taking; Spontaneous computation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33469850     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01857-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members.

Authors:  Matthew T Crawford; Steven J Sherman; David L Hamilton
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-11

2.  Is belief reasoning automatic?

Authors:  Ian A Apperly; Kevin J Riggs; Andrew Simpson; Claudia Chiavarino; Dana Samson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-10

3.  Two Equals One: Two Human Actions During Social Interaction Are Grouped as One Unit in Working Memory.

Authors:  Xiaowei Ding; Zaifeng Gao; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-07-18

4.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

5.  Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model.

Authors:  Emiel Cracco; Richard P Cooper
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Altercentric interference in level 1 visual perspective taking reflects the ascription of mental states, not submentalizing.

Authors:  Tiziano Furlanetto; Cristina Becchio; Dana Samson; Ian Apperly
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?

Authors:  Ian A Apperly; Stephen A Butterfill
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Mirroring multiple agents: motor resonance during action observation is modulated by the number of agents.

Authors:  Emiel Cracco; Lize De Coster; Michael Andres; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Altercentric intrusions from multiple perspectives: beyond dyads.

Authors:  Francesca Capozzi; Andrea Cavallo; Tiziano Furlanetto; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Submentalizing or mentalizing in a Level 1 perspective-taking task: A cloak and goggles test.

Authors:  Jane R Conway; Danna Lee; Mobin Ojaghi; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.