Literature DB >> 10907321

Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population.

E K Adams1, P D Mauldin, J G Mauldin, R M Mayberry.   

Abstract

The use of external cephalic version (ECV) is increasingly seen as an important clinical management strategy for breech presentation infants. Currently, 75% of women with breech presentation at term undergo Cesarean delivery risking adverse outcomes and incurring higher costs. ECV, if successful, reduces the rate of breech presentation at delivery and the need for Cesarean delivery. Data from an inner-city population of delivering women were examined to determine the effectiveness of ECV among these minority, low income women. Hospital clinical and Medicaid claims data for 679 deliveries with breech presentation were studied. Decision tree analysis indicated ECV was successful for 48% of those attempted. Based on amounts billed Medicaid, attempting ECV reduced the use of resources by a little over $3,000 per delivery. Sensitivity analysis showed, however, that the savings may be as low as $906. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent effect of attempting ECV on the probability of Cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10907321     DOI: 10.1023/a:1019097525279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  19 in total

Review 1.  The consequences and costs of maternal substance abuse in New York City. A pooled time-series, cross-section analysis.

Authors:  T Joyce; A D Racine; N Mocan
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Vaginal breech delivery in the 1990s.

Authors:  C P Weiner
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; T Liss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis.

Authors:  D S Gifford; E Keeler; K L Kahn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Breech presentation.

Authors:  D P Eller; J P VanDorsten
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  Predicting success of external cephalic version.

Authors:  R B Newman; B S Peacock; J P VanDorsten; H H Hunt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The distinction between cost and charges.

Authors:  S A Finkler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Has an increased cesarean section rate for term breech delivery reduced in incidence of birth asphyxia, trauma, and death?

Authors:  J E Green; F McLean; L P Smith; R Usher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  External cephalic version at term: is a tocolytic necessary?

Authors:  A W Robertson; J N Kopelman; J A Read; P Duff; D J Magelssen; E E Dashow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Maternal and fetal factors affecting success of antepartum external cephalic version.

Authors:  J E Ferguson; M A Armstrong; D C Dyson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Paul S Spencer; Yuval Weiss; Gary Ginsberg; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-02-24

2.  Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Tan; Alex Macario; Brendan Carvalho; Maurice L Druzin; Yasser Y El-Sayed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.