Literature DB >> 7770262

Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis.

D S Gifford1, E Keeler, K L Kahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe currently accepted methods for managing the term breech pregnancy, and to predict the delivery outcomes and costs of each method.
METHODS: Literature review was used to derive four options for the peripartum management of the term breech pregnancy. Using decision-analysis techniques, we calculated the predicted delivery outcomes and costs associated with each option.
RESULTS: Applying external cephalic version to all term breech pregnancies without contraindications to labor or version, and allowing a trial of labor for eligible women who fail version, results in a 25% cesarean rate, at a cost of $8071 per case. Delivering unsuccessful versions by scheduled cesarean results in a 32% cesarean rate, at a cost of $8276 per case. In contrast, a strategy not using external version but allowing a trial of labor for those mothers who meet eligibility criteria results in a 63% cesarean rate, at a cost of $8755 per case. Routinely scheduling a cesarean when a breech is identified at term results in an 89% cesarean rate, at a cost of $9544 per case.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the liberal use of vaginal delivery for term breech pregnancies has been suggested as one way of lowering the cesarean rate, the addition of routine external cephalic version to the management strategy will result in more vaginal deliveries and lower costs than strategies that allow vaginal delivery but do not include an attempted cephalic version. Routine cesarean without attempted external cephalic version results in excessive operative deliveries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7770262     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00044-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital.

Authors:  M James; K Hunt; R Burr; R Johanson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population.

Authors:  E K Adams; P D Mauldin; J G Mauldin; R M Mayberry
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-06

3.  Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Yamasato; Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Coming out ahead: the cost effectiveness of external cephalic version using spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  James A O'Brien; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-02-24

5.  Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Paul S Spencer; Yuval Weiss; Gary Ginsberg; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-02-24

6.  Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Tan; Alex Macario; Brendan Carvalho; Maurice L Druzin; Yasser Y El-Sayed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.