Literature DB >> 10906403

Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or soft lying mats.

.   

Abstract

In order to reduce straw input, soft lying mats are used increasingly instead of straw bedding in cubicle systems for dairy cows. This study aimed at comparing different types of soft lying mats with straw bedding regarding cow behaviour and leg injuries. Data were collected on five farms with straw bedding and on 13 farms using four types of soft lying mats consisting of different materials. On each farm, lying behaviour of 10 cows was recorded automatically during 3 days by means of a pneumatically operated resting sensor fitted in a belt. In addition, standing up and lying down behaviour of cows was quantified by direct observations, and all cows on a given farm were checked once for leg injuries.There were no significant differences between cows kept in cubicle systems with soft lying mats and straw bedding regarding the total time spent lying per day and the number of lying bouts per day. Standing up and lying down behaviour also did not differ between cows with access to soft lying mats and straw bedding. Leg injuries were most frequent in the tarsal and carpal joints. Cows kept in cubicle systems with soft lying mats had a significantly higher incidence of both hairless patches more than 2 cm in diameter (P<0.001) and scabs or wounds less than 2 cm in diameter (P<0.001) located in the tarsal joints than cows in cubicle systems with straw bedding. With the carpal joints, on the other hand, the incidence of leg injuries did not differ significantly between these two housing conditions. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that soft lying mats are equivalent to straw bedding in terms of cow behaviour but less favourable with respect to leg injuries located in the tarsal joints.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10906403     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00134-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  7 in total

1.  Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario.

Authors:  Kathy Zurbrigg; David Kelton; Neil Anderson; Suzanne Millman
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Antibiotic Use in Alpine Dairy Farms and Its Relation to Biosecurity and Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Francesca Menegon; Katia Capello; Jacopo Tarakdjian; Dario Pasqualin; Giovanni Cunial; Sara Andreatta; Debora Dellamaria; Grazia Manca; Giovanni Farina; Guido Di Martino
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

4.  Effects of Housing and Management Factors on Selected Indicators of the Welfare Quality® Protocol in Loose-Housed Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Daniel Gieseke; Christian Lambertz; Matthias Gauly
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  The Welfare of Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Pigs from the Perspective of Traumatic Injuries Detected at Slaughterhouse Postmortem Inspection.

Authors:  Lenka Valkova; Vladimir Vecerek; Eva Voslarova; Michal Kaluza; Daniela Takacova
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Carpal, tarsal, and stifle skin lesion prevalence and potential risk factors in Swiss dairy cows kept in tie stalls: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Johanna Karin Bernhard; Beatriz Vidondo; Rahel Lisa Achermann; Rahel Rediger; Kerstin Elisabeth Müller; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle.

Authors:  D Gieseke; C Lambertz; M Gauly
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.