Literature DB >> 10904464

Low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis using dalteparin in close proximity to surgery vs warfarin in hip arthroplasty patients: a double-blind, randomized comparison. The North American Fragmin Trial Investigators.

R D Hull1, G F Pineo, C Francis, D Bergqvist, C Fellenius, K Soderberg, A Holmqvist, M Mant, R Dear, B Baylis, A Mah, R Brant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on the current understanding that venous thrombosis starts perioperatively, administration of just-in-time low-molecular-weight heparin immediately before or in close proximity after hip arthroplasty may be more effective than usual clinical practice.
METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind trial comparing subcutaneous dalteparin sodium given once daily immediately before or early after surgery with the use of postoperative warfarin sodium in 1472 patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasties. The primary end point was deep vein thrombosis detected using contrast venography performed after surgery (mean, 5. 7 days) in each group.
RESULTS: The frequencies of deep vein thrombosis for patients with interpretable venograms receiving preoperative and postoperative dalteparin for all deep vein thrombosis were 36 (10.7%) of 337 (P<.001) and 44 (13.1%) of 336 (P<.001), respectively, vs 81 (24.0%) of 338 for warfarin; for proximal deep vein thrombosis, 3 (0.8%) of 354 (P =.04) and 3 (0.8%) of 358 (P =.03), respectively, vs 11 (3.0%) of 363. Relative risk reductions for the dalteparin groups ranged from 45% to 72%. Symptomatic thrombi were less frequent in the preoperative dalteparin group (5/337 patients [1.5%]) vs the warfarin group (15/338 patients [4.4%]) (P =.02). Serious bleeding was similar among groups. Increased major bleeding at the surgical site was observed for patients receiving preoperative dalteparin vs warfarin (P =.01).
CONCLUSIONS: A modified dalteparin regimen in close proximity to surgery resulted in substantive risk reductions for all and proximal deep vein thrombosis, compared with warfarin therapy. Such findings have not been observed with low-molecular-weight heparin therapy commenced 12 hours preoperatively or 12 to 24 hours postoperatively vs oral anticoagulants. Increased major but not serious bleeding occurred in patients receiving preoperative dalteparin. Dalteparin therapy initiated postoperatively provided superior efficacy vs warfarin without significantly increased overt bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10904464     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.14.2199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  33 in total

1.  Applying scientific criteria to therapeutic interchange: a balanced analysis of low-molecular-weight heparins.

Authors:  G J Merli; G J Vanscoy; T L Rihn; J B Groce; W McCormick
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Yngve Falck-Ytter; Charles W Francis; Norman A Johanson; Catherine Curley; Ola E Dahl; Sam Schulman; Thomas L Ortel; Stephen G Pauker; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Low-molecular-weight heparins: before or after surgery? New concepts and evidence: Congress report from the Sigma Tau/ROVI Satellite Symposium (Rome, Italy, 13 November 2006).

Authors:  Eduardo Rocha; Davide Imberti; Elio Paschina
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Blood loss in cemented THA is not reduced with postoperative versus preoperative start of thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  Pål O Borgen; Ola E Dahl; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas A Aloia; William H Geerts; Bryan M Clary; Ryan W Day; Alan W Hemming; Luiz Carneiro D'Albuquerque; Charles M Vollmer; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Giles J Toogood
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis for hip fractures.

Authors:  D Marsland; S C Mears; S L Kates
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Management and prevention of venous thromboembolism including surgery and the pregnant state.

Authors:  Steven B Deitelzweig
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2002

Review 8.  Thromboprophylaxis in elderly patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Clifford W Colwell; Mary E Hardwick
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project measures and hospital-associated infections following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Foster Chen; Michael Ward; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Measuring the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic consequences of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Sean D Sullivan; Susan R Kahn; Bruce L Davidson; Lars Borris; Patrick Bossuyt; Gary Raskob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.