Literature DB >> 10903575

Form representation in monkey inferotemporal cortex is virtually unaltered by free viewing.

J J DiCarlo1, J H Maunsell.   

Abstract

How are objects represented in the brain during natural behavior? Visual object recognition in primates is thought to depend on the inferotemporal cortex (IT). In most neurophysiological studies of IT, monkeys hold their direction of gaze fixed while isolated visual stimuli are presented (controlled viewing). However, during natural behavior, primates visually explore cluttered environments by changing gaze direction several times each second (free viewing). We examined the effect of free viewing on IT neuronal responses in monkeys engaged in a form-recognition task. By making small, real-time stimulus adjustments, we produced nearly identically retinal stimulation during controlled and free viewing. Nearly 90% of neuronal responses were unaffected by free viewing, and average stimulus selectivity was unchanged. Thus, neuronal representations that likely underlie form recognition are virtually unaltered by free viewing.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10903575     DOI: 10.1038/77722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  25 in total

1.  Noticing familiar objects in real world scenes: the role of temporal cortical neurons in natural vision.

Authors:  D L Sheinberg; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The effect of attention on neuronal responses to high and low contrast stimuli.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A stable topography of selectivity for unfamiliar shape classes in monkey inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Jennifer A Deutsch; Wim Vanduffel; Nancy G Kanwisher; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Macaque V1 activity during natural vision: effects of natural scenes and saccades.

Authors:  Sean P MacEvoy; Timothy D Hanks; Michael A Paradiso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant" object recognition?

Authors:  Nuo Li; David D Cox; Davide Zoccolan; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologies.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Unsupervised natural experience rapidly alters invariant object representation in visual cortex.

Authors:  Nuo Li; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  The significance of microsaccades for vision and oculomotor control.

Authors:  Han Collewijn; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Does learned shape selectivity in inferior temporal cortex automatically generalize across retinal position?

Authors:  David D Cox; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.