Literature DB >> 18787171

Unsupervised natural experience rapidly alters invariant object representation in visual cortex.

Nuo Li1, James J DiCarlo.   

Abstract

Object recognition is challenging because each object produces myriad retinal images. Responses of neurons from the inferior temporal cortex (IT) are selective to different objects, yet tolerant ("invariant") to changes in object position, scale, and pose. How does the brain construct this neuronal tolerance? We report a form of neuronal learning that suggests the underlying solution. Targeted alteration of the natural temporal contiguity of visual experience caused specific changes in IT position tolerance. This unsupervised temporal slowness learning (UTL) was substantial, increased with experience, and was significant in single IT neurons after just 1 hour. Together with previous theoretical work and human object perception experiments, we speculate that UTL may reflect the mechanism by which the visual stream builds and maintains tolerant object representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18787171      PMCID: PMC3307055          DOI: 10.1126/science.1160028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  42 in total

1.  Neuronal representations of stimulus associations develop in the temporal lobe during learning.

Authors:  A Messinger; L R Squire; S M Zola; T D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Limited translation invariance of human visual pattern recognition.

Authors:  M Dill; M Fahle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-01

Review 4.  Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system.

Authors:  G Wallis; E T Rolls
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  M Ito; H Tamura; I Fujita; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  N Sigala; F Gabbiani; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Visual object recognition.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; A F Dean
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates.

Authors:  K Sakai; Y Miyashita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Learning and neural plasticity in visual object recognition.

Authors:  Zoe Kourtzi; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  96 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Uncovering the visual "alphabet": advances in our understanding of object perception.

Authors:  Leslie G Ungerleider; Andrew H Bell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame.

Authors:  En Zhang; Wu Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in high-level vision.

Authors:  David B T McMahon; David A Leopold
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  C Daniel Salzman; Stefano Fusi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Jeffrey Y M Siow; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Visual object recognition: building invariant representations over time.

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Raphael Pinaud
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.