Literature DB >> 19439676

What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant" object recognition?

Nuo Li1, David D Cox, Davide Zoccolan, James J DiCarlo.   

Abstract

Primates can easily identify visual objects over large changes in retinal position--a property commonly referred to as position "invariance." This ability is widely assumed to depend on neurons in inferior temporal cortex (IT) that can respond selectively to isolated visual objects over similarly large ranges of retinal position. However, in the real world, objects rarely appear in isolation, and the interplay between position invariance and the representation of multiple objects (i.e., clutter) remains unresolved. At the heart of this issue is the intuition that the representations of nearby objects can interfere with one another and that the large receptive fields needed for position invariance can exacerbate this problem by increasing the range over which interference acts. Indeed, most IT neurons' responses are strongly affected by the presence of clutter. While external mechanisms (such as attention) are often invoked as a way out of the problem, we show (using recorded neuronal data and simulations) that the intrinsic properties of IT population responses, by themselves, can support object recognition in the face of limited clutter. Furthermore, we carried out extensive simulations of hypothetical neuronal populations to identify the essential individual-neuron ingredients of a good population representation. These simulations show that the crucial neuronal property to support recognition in clutter is not preservation of response magnitude, but preservation of each neuron's rank-order object preference under identity-preserving image transformations (e.g., clutter). Because IT neuronal responses often exhibit that response property, while neurons in earlier visual areas (e.g., V1) do not, we suggest that preserving the rank-order object preference regardless of clutter, rather than the response magnitude, more precisely describes the goal of individual neurons at the top of the ventral visual stream.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19439676      PMCID: PMC2712271          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90745.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  49 in total

1.  Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-13       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  A theory of how the brain might work.

Authors:  T Poggio
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1990

4.  Interactions of visual stimuli in the receptive fields of inferior temporal neurons in awake macaques.

Authors:  T Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  J P Jones; L A Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Responses of neurons in the inferior temporal cortex in short term and serial recognition memory tasks.

Authors:  G C Baylis; E T Rolls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  J Moran; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons.

Authors:  E L Schwartz; R Desimone; T D Albright; C G Gross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; A F Dean
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  45 in total

1.  Probing principles of large-scale object representation: category preference and location encoding.

Authors:  Radoslaw Martin Cichy; Philipp Sterzer; Jakob Heinzle; Lloyd T Elliott; Fernando Ramirez; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Shape encoding consistency across colors in primate V4.

Authors:  Brittany N Bushnell; Anitha Pasupathy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Uncovering the visual "alphabet": advances in our understanding of object perception.

Authors:  Leslie G Ungerleider; Andrew H Bell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Jeffrey Y M Siow; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Joint tuning for direction of motion and binocular disparity in macaque MT is largely separable.

Authors:  Alexandra Smolyanskaya; Douglas A Ruff; Richard T Born
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Ethan M Meyers; Narcisse P Bichot; Thomas Serre; Tomaso A Poggio; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Brain modularity in arthropods: individual neurons that support "what" but not "where" memories.

Authors:  Julieta Sztarker; Daniel Tomsic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Goedele Van Belle; Wim Vanduffel; Bruno Rossion; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contour Curvature As an Invariant Code for Objects in Visual Area V4.

Authors:  Yasmine El-Shamayleh; Anitha Pasupathy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Invariance in visual object recognition requires training: a computational argument.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.