Literature DB >> 10902738

Inactivation of human normal and tumour cells irradiated with low energy protons.

M Belli1, D Bettega, P Calzolari, F Cera, R Cherubini, M Dalla Vecchia, M Durante, S Favaretto, G Gialanella, G Grossi, R Marchesini, G Moschini, A Piazzola, G Poli, M Pugliese, O Sapora, P Scampoli, G Simone, E Sorrentino, M A Tabocchini, L Tallone, P Tiveron.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyse the cell inactivation frequencies induced by low energy protons in human cells with different sensitivity to photon radiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human cell lines with various sensitivities to photon irradiation were used: the SCC25 and SQ20B derived from human epithelium tumours of the tongue and larynx, respectively, and the normal lines M/10, derived from human mammary epithelium, and HF19 derived from a lung fibroblast. The cells were irradiated with y-rays and proton beams with linear energy transfer (LET) from 7 to 33 keV/microm. Clonogenic survival was assessed.
RESULTS: Survival curves are reported for each cell line following irradiation with gamma-rays and with various proton LETs. The surviving fraction after 2 Gy of gamma-rays was 0.72 for SQ20B cells, and 0.28-0.35 for the other cell lines. The maximum LET proton effectiveness was generally greater than that of gamma-rays. In particular there was a marked increase in beam effectiveness with increasing LET for the most resistant cells (SQ20B) whose 2 Gy-survival varied from 0.72 with gamma-radiation down to 0.37 with 30 keV/microm protons. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE(2 Gy gamma)) with the 30 keV/microm beam, evaluated as the ratio of 2 Gy to the proton dose producing the same inactivation level as that given by 2 Gy of gamma-rays, was 3.2, 1.8, 1.3 and 0.8 for SQ20B, M/10, SCC25, and HF19, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: RBE for inactivation with high-LET protons increased with the cellular radioresistance to gamma-rays. The cell line with the greatest resistance to gamma-rays was the most responsive to the highest LET proton beam. A similar trend has also been found in studies reported in the literature with He, C, N ions with LET in the range 20-125 keV/microm on human tumour cell lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902738     DOI: 10.1080/09553000050028995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  24 in total

Review 1.  New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology.

Authors:  M Durante
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Why RBE must be a variable and not a constant in proton therapy.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Relative biological effectiveness of the 60-MeV therapeutic proton beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Beata Biesaga; Jan Swakoń; Damian Kabat; Leszek Grzanka; Marta Ptaszkiewicz; Urszula Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Low energy proton beam induces tumor cell apoptosis through reactive oxygen species and activation of caspases.

Authors:  Kheun Byeol Lee; Jong Soo Lee; Jeen Woo Park; Tae Lin Huh; You Mie Lee
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 8.718

5.  A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy based on all published in vitro cell survival data.

Authors:  Aimee L McNamara; Jan Schuemann; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

7.  Dilemmas concerning dose distribution and the influence of relative biological effect in proton beam therapy of medulloblastoma.

Authors:  B Jones; P Wilson; A Nagano; J Fenwick; G McKenna
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Investigating Dependencies of Relative Biological Effectiveness for Proton Therapy in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Michelle E Howard; Chris Beltran; Sarah Anderson; Wan Chan Tseung; Jann N Sarkaria; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-03-21

9.  A simple model for calculating relative biological effectiveness of X-rays and gamma radiation in cell survival.

Authors:  Oleg N Vassiliev; Christine B Peterson; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Systematic analysis of RBE and related quantities using a database of cell survival experiments with ion beam irradiation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich; Uwe Scholz; Thilo Elsässer; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.