Literature DB >> 15459401

Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in men in the mid-west of Ireland.

J Powell1, C O'Connor, M O'hlarlaithe, J Saunders, J De Freitas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of chlamydia infection in young men in the Mid-Western Health Board Region of Ireland, and to determine risk factors for its acquisition.
METHODS: Consecutive men attending orthopaedic clinics (OPD), and a university sports arena (UL) were recruited to a chlamydia prevalence study. All men aged 17-35 who had been sexually active and had not passed urine in the last hour were eligible. Information about chlamydia was given, informed consent obtained, and a self administered questionnaire was completed. A first void urine (FVU) was collected and tested by ligase chain reaction (LCR).
RESULTS: 82% (207/252) of men from OPD, and 60% (186/310) from UL participated. 6.3% (13/207) from the OPD and 5.4% (10/186) from UL tested LCR positive, giving an overall prevalence of 5.9% (23/393). Proved risk factors for chlamydial positivity were: (1) more than one sexual partner in previous 6 months, (2) more than eight lifetime sexual partners, (3) current symptoms (dysuria or discharge). No statistical significance was found for age, condom use, smoking, days since last sexual intercourse and previous GUM clinic attendance. No statistically significant difference to cost effective prevalence of 6% was shown.
CONCLUSIONS: A 5.9% prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis was found which is cost effective to screen and treat. Non-invasive screening of men in the community was possible. Numbers of sexual partners and current symptoms were significant risk factors. Since only 25% of men in this laboratory were diagnosed with chlamydia outside the GUM clinic, compared with 59% of women, it is important that community screening of men is promoted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15459401      PMCID: PMC1744887          DOI: 10.1136/sti.2003.008615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  21 in total

Review 1.  Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research.

Authors:  K A Fenton; A M Johnson; S McManus; B Erens
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  The future of chlamydia screening.

Authors:  J M Tobin; V Harindra; L J Tucker
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London.

Authors:  T Pierpoint; B Thomas; A Judd; R Brugha; D Taylor-Robinson; A Renton
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Performance and cost-effectiveness of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women. Implications for a national Chlamydia control strategy.

Authors:  J M Marrazzo; C L Celum; S D Hillis; D Fine; S DeLisle; H H Handsfield
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Cost-benefit analysis of first-void urine Chlamydia trachomatis screening program.

Authors:  J Paavonen; M Puolakkainen; M Paukku; H Sintonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Is screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection cost effective?

Authors:  J Paavonen
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

Review 7.  Screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: have we fully explored the possibilities?

Authors:  K A Fenton
Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health       Date:  2000-06

Review 8.  Screening for genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  J M Stephenson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women attending family planning clinics. A cost-effectiveness analysis of three strategies.

Authors:  M R Howell; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male undergraduates: a postal survey.

Authors:  K E Rogstad; S M Bates; S Partridge; G Kudesia; R Poll; M A Osborne; S Dixon
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.519

View more
  7 in total

1.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women attending outpatient clinics in a large maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland.

Authors:  H M McMillan; H O'Carroll; J S Lambert; K B Grundy; M O'Reilly; B Lennon; C Collins; T A Walsh; M P Geary; M T Cafferkey
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in men attending three different secondary healthcare settings.

Authors:  S Sripada; S Logan; S McGillivray; H McKenzie; A Templeton; M Hamilton; A Sutherland; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection and associated risk factors in a low-income marginalized urban population in coastal Peru.

Authors:  Segundo R León; Kelika A Konda; Jeffrey D Klausner; Franca R Jones; Carlos F Cáceres; Thomas J Coates
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2009-07

4.  Where do young men want to access STI screening? A stratified random probability sample survey of young men in Great Britain.

Authors:  John M Saunders; Catherine H Mercer; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Graham J Hart; Jackie Cassell; Claudia S Estcourt
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  "Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Deirdre Vaughan; Emer O'Connell; Martin Cormican; Ruairi Brugha; Colette Faherty; Myles Balfe; Diarmuid O'Donovan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection and sexual behaviour among female students attending higher education in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Emer O'Connell; Wendy Brennan; Martin Cormican; Marita Glacken; Diarmuid O'Donovan; Akke Vellinga; Niall Cahill; Fionnguala Lysaght; Joan O'Donnell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Sexually transmitted infection incidence among adolescents in Ireland.

Authors:  Martin P Davoren; Kevin Hayes; Mary Horgan; Frances Shiely
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2014-06-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.