Literature DB >> 10899344

Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur.

D C Wirtz1, N Schiffers, T Pandorf, K Radermacher, D Weichert, R Forst.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a meta-analysis of the literature we evaluated the present knowledge of the material properties of cortical and cancellous bone to answer the question whether the available data are sufficient to realize anisotropic finite element (FE)-models of the proximal femur. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: All studies that met the following criteria were analyzed: Young's modulus, tensile, compressive and torsional strengths, Poisson's ratio, the shear modulus and the viscoelastic properties had to be determined experimentally. The experiments had to be carried out in a moist environment and at room temperature with freshly removed and untreated human cadaverous femurs. All material properties had to be determined in defined load directions (axial, transverse) and should have been correlated to apparent density (g/cm(3)), reflecting the individually variable and age-dependent changes of bone material properties.
RESULTS: Differences in Young's modulus of cortical [cancellous] bone at a rate of between 33% (58%) (at low apparent density) and 62% (80%) (at high apparent density), are higher in the axial than in the transverse load direction. Similar results have been seen for the compressive strength of femoral bone. For the tensile and torsional strengths, Poisson's ratio and the shear modulus, only ultimate values have been found without a correlation to apparent density. For the viscoelastic behaviour of bone only data of cortical bone and in axial load direction have been described up to now.
CONCLUSIONS: Anisotropic FE-models of the femur could be realized for most part with the summarized material properties of bone if characterized by apparent density and load directions. Because several mechanical properties have not been correlated to these main criteria, further experimental investigations will be necessary in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899344     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00069-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  45 in total

1.  Calibration of the mechanical properties in a finite element model of a lumbar vertebra under dynamic compression up to failure.

Authors:  Anaïs Garo; Pierre Jean Arnoux; Eric Wagnac; Carl Eric Aubin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: clinical outcome and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; André Lutz; Udo Nackenhorst; Fritz Thorey; Hazibullah Waizy; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Influence of cup-center-edge angle on micro-motion at the interface between the cup and host bone in cementless total hip arthroplasty: three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kaku; Tomonori Tabata; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-08-29

Review 4.  The trends and challenges in orthopaedic simulation.

Authors:  Mohamed Mediouni; Alexander Volosnikov
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-19

5.  Performance of CF/PA12 composite femoral stems.

Authors:  Melissa Campbell; Martin N Bureau; L'Hocine Yahia
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Transversely isotropic and isotropic material considerations in determining the mechanical response of geometrically accurate bovine tibia bone.

Authors:  Reem A Yassine; Ramsey F Hamade
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Principal trabecular structural orientation predicted by quantitative ultrasound is strongly correlated with μFEA determined anisotropic apparent stiffness.

Authors:  Liangjun Lin; Han Yuen Oon; Wei Lin; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-01-14

Review 8.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Porous and strong bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds prepared by unidirectional freezing of camphene-based suspensions.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Qiang Fu; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  A biomechanical sorting of clinical risk factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.