Literature DB >> 10898411

Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography.

M Regenfus1, D Ropers, S Achenbach, W Kessler, G Laub, W G Daniel, W Moshage.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) technique for detection of coronary artery stenoses.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of previously published MR coronary angiography protocols varies widely. Recently, coronary artery imaging using T1-shortening contrast agent has become possible, but so far there are no data concerning its clinical application.
METHODS: Magnetic resonance coronary angiography was performed in 50 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Magnetic resonance data acquisition using an ultrafast 3D gradient-echo sequence lasted over 32 heartbeats within one single breath-hold. Twenty milliliters of gadopentetate dimeglumine was injected at a flow rate of 1 ml/s for two successive studies covering the main coronary arteries in single-oblique planes. Stenosis assessment by MR was compared with significant (diameter stenosis > 50%) stenoses on X-ray angiography. Evaluation was limited to the proximal and mid-coronary artery segments.
RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight of 350 artery segments (76.6%) could be evaluated. Left circumflex coronary artery was only evaluable in 50% of cases by MR. In the evaluable segments, 48 of 56 stenoses and 193 of 212 nonstenotic segments were correctly classified by MR. On a patient basis, MR correctly identified 34 of 36 patients with and 8 of 14 patients without significant coronary stenoses as demonstrated by X-ray angiography (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 57.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Oblique projection contrast-enhanced MR coronary angiograms obtained within one single breath-hold permit identification of patients with coronary stenoses in the proximal and mid segments of the major coronary arteries with satisfactory accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10898411     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00672-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

1.  Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  C R Peebles
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  MR imaging of the coronary vasculature: imaging the lumen, wall, and beyond.

Authors:  Kai Lin; James C Carr
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sumeesh Dhawan; Kodlipet C Dharmashankar; Tahir Tak
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2004-08

4.  3D MR coronary angiography: optimization of the technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Niek Hendrik Jan Prakken; Evert-Jan P A Vonken; Birgitta K Velthuis; Pieter A F M Doevendans; Maarten-Jan M Cramer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography with Vasovist: in-vivo T1 estimation to improve image quality of navigator and breath-hold techniques.

Authors:  Kai Nassenstein; Kai-Uwe Waltering; Sebastian Kelle; Thomas Schlosser; Frank Breuckmann; Stefan Maderwald; Peter Hunold; Eike Nagel; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-detector computed tomography: comparison to conventional X-ray angiography.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Sandy S Halliburton; Stacie A Kuzmiak; Tracy Painter; Richard D White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  CT for imaging coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for its application.

Authors:  Bernd M Ohnesorge; Lars K Hofmann; Thomas G Flohr; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Three-dimensional breathhold magnetization-prepared TrueFISP: a pilot study for magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Richard M McCarthy; Vibhas S Deshpande; Nirat Beohar; Sheridan N Meyers; Steven M Shea; Jordin D Green; Xin Liu; Xiaoming Bi; F Scott Pereles; John Paul Finn; Charles J Davidson; James C Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Leo; Erica Fisci; Francesco Secchi; Marco Alì; Federico Ambrogi; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: where are we today?

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Rene M Botnar; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.931

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.