Literature DB >> 10895909

Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds.

J E Bertram1, D V Lee, H N Case, R J Todhunter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds to determine whether differences in locomotion are attributable to differences in their manner of moving or to body size and shape differences between these 2 breeds. ANIMALS: 8 healthy 5-month-old Greyhounds and 5 healthy Labrador Retrievers between 6 and 18 months old. PROCEDURE: A series of 4 force platforms was used to record independent ground reaction forces on the forelimbs and hind limbs during trotting. Values of stride parameters were compared between breeds before and after normalization for size differences. Standard values of absolute and normalized stride period and stride length were determined from linear regressions of these parameters on relative (normalized) velocity. Forces were normalized to body weight and compared at the same relative velocity.
RESULTS: Greyhounds used fewer, longer strides than the Labrador Retrievers to travel at the same absolute speed. After normalization for body size differences, most measurable differences between breeds were eliminated. Subtle differences that did persist related to proportion of the stride that the forefoot was in contact with the ground, timing of initial hind foot contact relative to initial forefoot contact, and distribution of vertical force between the forelimbs and hind limbs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that apparent differences in the trotting gait between Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds are mainly attributable to differences in size, and that dogs of these 2 breeds move in a dynamically similar manner at the trot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10895909     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  28 in total

1.  Directionally compliant legs influence the intrinsic pitch behaviour of a trotting quadruped.

Authors:  David V Lee; Sanford G Meek
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Kinetic measurements of gait for osteoarthritis research in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Maxim Moreau; Bertrand Lussier; Laurent Ballaz; Eric Troncy
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Evaluation of a novel accelerometer for kinetic gait analysis in dogs.

Authors:  Kyle Clark; Charles Caraguel; Lorne Leahey; Romain Béraud
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Variance associated with walking velocity during force platform gait analysis of a heterogeneous sample of clinically normal dogs.

Authors:  Alexander M Piazza; Emily E Binversie; Lauren A Baker; Brett Nemke; Susannah J Sample; Peter Muir
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  Variance associated with subject velocity and trial repetition during force platform gait analysis in a heterogeneous population of clinically normal dogs.

Authors:  Eric C Hans; Berdien Zwarthoed; Joseph Seliski; Brett Nemke; Peter Muir
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.688

6.  Ground Reaction Forces and Center of Pressure within the Paws When Stepping over Obstacles in Dogs.

Authors:  Danae Charalambous; Therese Strasser; Alexander Tichy; Barbara Bockstahler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Kinematics of gait in golden retriever muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Anthony P Marsh; Joel D Eggebeen; Joe N Kornegay; Chad D Markert; Martin K Childers
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 4.296

8.  Variance associated with the use of relative velocity for force platform gait analysis in a heterogeneous population of clinically normal dogs.

Authors:  Nicola Volstad; Brett Nemke; Peter Muir
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.688

9.  Fore-aft ground force adaptations to induced forelimb lameness in walking and trotting dogs.

Authors:  Jalal Abdelhadi; Patrick Wefstaedt; Ingo Nolte; Nadja Schilling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Planar Covariation of Hindlimb and Forelimb Elevation Angles during Terrestrial and Aquatic Locomotion of Dogs.

Authors:  Giovanna Catavitello; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.