Literature DB >> 10894069

Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast.

M L Giger1, H Al-Hallaq, Z Huo, C Moran, D E Wolverton, C W Chan, W Zhong.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Breast sonography is not routinely used to distinguish benign from malignant solid masses because of considerable overlap in their sonographic appearances. The purpose of this study was to investigate the computerized analyses of breast lesions in ultrasonographic (US) images in order to ultimately aid in the task of discriminating between malignant and benign lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Features related to lesion margin, shape, homogeneity (texture), and posterior acoustic attenuation pattern in US images of the breast were extracted and calculated. The study database contained 184 digitized US images from 58 patients with 78 lesions. Benign lesions were confirmed at biopsy or cyst aspiration or with image interpretation alone; malignant lesions were confirmed at biopsy. Performance of the various individual features and output from linear discriminant analysis in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions was studied by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: At ROC analysis, the feature characterizing the margin yielded Az values (area under the ROC curve) of 0.85 and 0.75 in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions for the entire database and for an "equivocal" database, respectively. The equivocal database contained lesions that had been proved to be benign or malignant at cyst aspiration or biopsy. Linear discriminant analysis round-robin runs yielded Az values of 0.94 and 0.87 in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions for the entire database and for the equivocal database, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Computerized analysis of US images has the potential to increase the specificity of breast sonography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10894069     DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80115-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  8 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of texture characteristics of malignant and benign tumors in breast ultrasonograms.

Authors:  K G Kim; J H Kim; B G Min
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computer-aided diagnostic models in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Turgay Ayer; Mehmet Us Ayvaci; Ze Xiu Liu; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2010-06-01

4.  Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features.

Authors:  Dennis Mackin; Xenia Fave; Lifei Zhang; David Fried; Jinzhong Yang; Brian Taylor; Edgardo Rodriguez-Rivera; Cristina Dodge; Aaron Kyle Jones; Laurence Court
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  A deep feature fusion methodology for breast cancer diagnosis demonstrated on three imaging modality datasets.

Authors:  Natalia Antropova; Benjamin Q Huynh; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Yading Yuan; Maryellen L Giger; Hui Li; Neha Bhooshan; Charlene A Sennett
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Karla Horsch; Maryellen L Giger; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.