Literature DB >> 10893370

Beliefs among pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons in the therapeutic approach to non-small cell lung cancer.

A T Schroen1, F C Detterbeck, R Crawford, M P Rivera, M A Socinski.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: The physicians who initially evaluate patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) strongly impact the course of therapy. Their beliefs in treatment and prognosis may contribute to practices of variable quality and appropriateness. We sought to better describe beliefs among pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons who were selected for guiding early therapy and referrals in patients with NSCLC.
DESIGN: Mail questionnaire focusing on survival estimates, treatment perceptions, and referral patterns. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve hundred pulmonologists and 800 thoracic surgeons who were clinically active members of the American College of Chest Physicians. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Response rates of 50% for pulmonologists and 52% for thoracic surgeons were obtained after two mailings. Five-year survival estimates for patients with resected stage I NSCLC revealed that 30% of respondents overestimated survival rates and 18% underestimated survival rates. The underestimation of survival rate was found among more respondents who are practicing pulmonology than thoracic surgery (22% vs 10% [corrected], respectively), who were trained before 1980 than after 1980 (29% vs 10% [corrected], respectively), and who were seeing < 10 lung cancer patients annually than those who were seeing > 25 (31% vs 0.14%, respectively). Beliefs in the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy or of radiation in stage I-IIIA disease divided respondents within both specialties. Chemotherapy plus radiation vs radiation alone in unresectable stage IIIA-B NSCLC was viewed as benefiting survival less often by physicians seeing < 10 lung cancer patients annually rather than > 25 (57% vs 77% [corrected], respectively) and by physicians underestimating rather than correctly estimating survival in early-stage disease (58% vs 72% [corrected], respectively). Chemotherapy was believed to confer survival benefits in patients with stage IV disease by one third of respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: Certain physician characteristics, particularly the length of time since training and NSCLC patient volume, are associated with beliefs not conclusively supported in the medical literature or with opinions inconsistent within and between specialties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10893370     DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.1.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  10 in total

1.  Variations in Oncologist Recommendations for Chemotherapy for Stage IV Lung Cancer: What Is the Role of Performance Status?

Authors:  Diana Tisnado; Jennifer Malin; Katherine Kahn; Mary Beth Landrum; Robert Fletcher; Carrie Klabunde; Steven Clauser; Selwyn O Rogers; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Decisions for lung cancer chemotherapy: the influence of physician and patient factors.

Authors:  Patricia M Davidson; Moyez Jiwa; Alice J Goldsmith; Sarah J McGrath; Michelle Digiacomo; Jane L Phillips; Meera Agar; Phillip J Newton; David C Currow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Longer lengths of stay and higher risk of mortality among inpatients of physicians with more years in practice.

Authors:  William N Southern; Eran Y Bellin; Julia H Arnsten
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Survival after community diagnosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Norma F Kanarek; Craig M Hooker; Luckson Mathieu; Hua-Ling Tsai; Charles M Rudin; James G Herman; Malcolm V Brock
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Lung cancer: district active treatment rates affect survival.

Authors:  M L Cartman; A C Hatfield; M F Muers; M D Peake; R A Haward; D Forman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Decision-making by surgeons about referral for adjuvant therapy for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast or colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Cynthia Kendell; Gordon Buduhan; Daniel Rayson; Joan Sargeant; Paul Johnson; Eva Grunfeld; Geoffrey A Porter
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-01-12

7.  Modern treatment of cerebral metastases: Integrated Medical Learning(SM) at CNS 2007.

Authors:  Michael A Vogelbaum; Anthony L Asher; Douglas Kondziolka; Nicholas M Boulis; Nathan R Selden; Brian L Hoh; Fred G Barker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  A systematic review of the impact of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Jeffrey Dunn; Stefano Occhipinti; Suzanne Hughes; Peter Baade; Sue Sinclair; Joanne Aitken; Pip Youl; Dianne L O'Connell
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  How do surgeons decide to refer patients for adjuvant cancer treatment? Protocol for a qualitative study.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Cynthia Kendell; Joan Sargeant; Gordon Buduhan; Paul Johnson; Daniel Rayson; Eva Grunfeld; Geoffrey A Porter
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Benefits, harms and evidence - reflections from UK primary healthcare.

Authors:  Margaret McCartney
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2017-10-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.