Literature DB >> 27271507

Variations in Oncologist Recommendations for Chemotherapy for Stage IV Lung Cancer: What Is the Role of Performance Status?

Diana Tisnado1, Jennifer Malin2, Katherine Kahn2, Mary Beth Landrum2, Robert Fletcher2, Carrie Klabunde2, Steven Clauser2, Selwyn O Rogers2, Nancy L Keating2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy prolongs survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, few studies have included patients with poor performance status. This study examined rates of oncologists' recommendations for chemotherapy by patient performance status and symptoms and how physician characteristics influence chemotherapy recommendations.
METHODS: We surveyed medical oncologists involved in the care of a population-based cohort of patients with lung cancer from the CanCORS (Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance) study. Physicians were queried about their likelihood to recommend chemotherapy to patients with stage IV lung cancer with varying performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 [good] v 3 [poor]) and presence or absence of tumor-related pain. Repeated measures logistic regression was used to estimate the independent associations of patients' performance status and symptoms and physicians' demographic and practice characteristics with chemotherapy recommendations.
RESULTS: Nearly all physicians (adjusted rate, 97% to 99%) recommended chemotherapy for patients with good performance status, and approximately half (adjusted rate, 38% to 53%) recommended chemotherapy for patients with poor performance status (P < .001). Compared with patient factors, physician and practice characteristics were less strongly associated with chemotherapy recommendations in adjusted analyses.
CONCLUSION: Strong consensus among oncologists exists for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status. However, the relatively high rate of chemotherapy recommendations for patients with poor performance status despite the unfavorable risk-benefit profile highlights the need for ongoing work to define high-value care in oncology and to implement and evaluate strategies to align incentives for such care.
Copyright © 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27271507      PMCID: PMC4957251          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  38 in total

Review 1.  American Society of Clinical Oncology treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer guideline: update 2003.

Authors:  David G Pfister; David H Johnson; Christopher G Azzoli; William Sause; Thomas J Smith; Sherman Baker; Jemi Olak; Diane Stover; John R Strawn; Andrew T Turrisi; Mark R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Paul J Catalano; Angel Cronin; Matthew D Finkelman; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Perceptions of prognosis, treatment, and treatment impact on prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E A Perez
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Financial toxicity, Part I: a new name for a growing problem.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Lung cancer treatment in New Zealand: physician's attitudes.

Authors:  Tim Christmas; Michael Findlay
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2004-06-18

Review 7.  Second or third additional chemotherapy drug for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with advanced disease.

Authors:  Catherine Delbaldo; Stefan Michiels; Estelle Rolland; Nathalie Syz; Jean-Charles Soria; Thierry Le Chevalier; Jean-Pierre Pignon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

8.  Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how much benefit is enough?

Authors:  R Grilli; A D Oxman; J A Julian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Financial Insolvency as a Risk Factor for Early Mortality Among Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Aasthaa Bansal; Catherine R Fedorenko; David K Blough; Karen A Overstreet; Veena Shankaran; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Chemotherapeutic management of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mark A Socinski; David E Morris; Gregory A Masters; Rogerio Lilenbaum
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Performance Status.

Authors:  R Simcock; J Wright
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults Optimized by Geriatric Assessment and Intervention: A Non-Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Munzir Hamid; Michelle Hannan; Nay Myo Oo; Paula Lynch; Darren J Walsh; Tara Matthews; Stephen Madden; Miriam O'Connor; Paula Calvert; Anne M Horgan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Association between physician US News & World Report medical school ranking and patient outcomes and costs of care: observational study.

Authors:  Yusuke Tsugawa; Daniel M Blumenthal; Ashish K Jha; E John Orav; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.