Literature DB >> 10888287

Sweet taste of aspartame and sucrose: effects on diet-induced thermogenesis.

L Prat-Larquemin1, J M Oppert, F Bellisle, B Guy-Grand.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Among factors that affect diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT) are the sensory characteristics of food. The aim of this study was to test whether the sweet flavour obtained with a low-energy sweetener (aspartame) or with sucrose have a different effect on DIT. Following a standardized breakfast, 24 healthy male subjects were served three test lunches in a randomized fashion. Lunch contained soft white cheese added with maltodextrins and aspartame, or sucrose, or maltodextrins only (non-sweetened control) (each 900 kcal). Energy expenditure (indirect calorimetry) was monitored during the five postprandial hours. For the first two periods of measurement (30-60 and 90-120 min after meal ingestion), postprandial energy expenditure was significantly increased with sucrose compared to maltodextrins and maltodextrins plus aspartame, whereas no significant difference was found between maltodextrins and maltodextrins plus aspartame. No significant difference between lunches was observed for DIT expressed as incremental area above premeal baseline energy expenditure. Plasma glucose area under the curve was significantly lower for sucrose compared to maltodextrins plus aspartame. Plasma insulin area under the curve was significantly lower for sucrose compared to the other tests foods. IN
CONCLUSION: (1) variation in sweet-taste induced by aspartame or by sucrose does not seem to have a major effect on DIT in healthy humans; (2) differences in energy expenditure observed in the early postprandial period suggest a substrate effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10888287     DOI: 10.1006/appe.1999.0310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  8 in total

Review 1.  Specific dynamic action: a review of the postprandial metabolic response.

Authors:  Stephen M Secor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 2.  Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Glycaemic Control.

Authors:  Yoona Kim; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Diet induced thermogenesis.

Authors:  Klaas R Westerterp
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 4.  Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Postprandial energy expenditure in whole-food and processed-food meals: implications for daily energy expenditure.

Authors:  Sadie B Barr; Jonathan C Wright
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  A systematic review on the effect of sweeteners on glycemic response and clinically relevant outcomes.

Authors:  Natasha Wiebe; Raj Padwal; Catherine Field; Seth Marks; Rene Jacobs; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Sweet Taste Antagonist Lactisole Administered in Combination with Sucrose, But Not Glucose, Increases Energy Intake and Decreases Peripheral Serotonin in Male Subjects.

Authors:  Kerstin Schweiger; Verena Grüneis; Julia Treml; Claudia Galassi; Corinna M Karl; Jakob P Ley; Gerhard E Krammer; Barbara Lieder; Veronika Somoza
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Postprandial energy metabolism and substrate oxidation in response to the inclusion of a sugar- or non-nutritive sweetened beverage with meals differing in protein content.

Authors:  Shanon L Casperson; Clint Hall; James N Roemmich
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2017-07-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.