Literature DB >> 10888273

Long-term survival estimates of cast gold inlays and onlays with their analysis of failures.

S P Studer1, F Wettstein, C Lehner, T G Zullo, P Schärer.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical behaviour of cast gold restorations with respect to define a gold control against current and future ceramic and composite restorations. The study sample included 50 patients with 303 cast gold restorations. All restorations were cemented with a non-adhesive technique. A total of 303 restorations were evaluated clinically and radiographically using modified United States Public Health Service criteria. Restorations recorded as having an A- or a B-rating were defined as successful. Of the 303 restorations, 42 were judged as failures, which resulted in a failure rate of 13.8% for a mean observation time (+/- s.d.) of 18.7 ( +/- 9.5) years. The estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rates (s.e.) were 96.1% (+/- 1.1%) at 10 years, 87.0% (+/- 2.2%) at 20 years and 73.5% (+/- 5.4%) at 30 years. In total, biological reasons were counted 25 times in comparison to 17 technical reasons for those 42 failed cast gold restorations, with 17 secondary caries (40%) as the most common biological reason and with 13 retention losses (31%) as the most common technical reason. The endodontically treated tooth was exclusively identified as a risk factor. The restoration type (inlay versus onlay) did not influence the survival rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10888273     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00540.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  8 in total

1.  Two-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Tobias Männer; Karl-Anton Hiller; Sebastian Schmidt; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Clinical outcome of bonded partial indirect posterior restorations on vital and non-vital teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Dioguardi; Mario Alovisi; Giuseppe Troiano; Carlo Vito Alberto Caponio; Andrea Baldi; Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Allegra Comba; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Nicola Scotti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  J Wagner; K-A Hiller; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Three-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  M Federlin; J Wagner; T Männer; K-A Hiller; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.

Authors:  Petra C Guess; Thaleia Vagkopoulou; Yu Zhang; Martin Wolkewitz; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with modern restorative materials.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Hamouda; Salah H Shehata
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-11

Review 7.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Restoration of 1325 teeth with partial-coverage crowns manufactured from high noble metal alloys: a retrospective case series 18.8 years after prosthetic delivery.

Authors:  Philipp Rehm; Hermann Derks; Wilfried Lesaar; Benedikt Christopher Spies; Florian Beuer; Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.