Literature DB >> 29079080

Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: Potential bias due to air sampling stress.

Huajun Zhen1, Valdis Krumins1, Donna E Fennell1, Gediminas Mainelis2.   

Abstract

A limited number of studies have been conducted to analyze ribosomal RNA (rRNA, present in the ribosome) in bioaerosol samples to identify currently or potentially active airborne microbes, although its genomic counterpart, the rRNA gene (on the chromosome) has been frequently targeted for airborne microbial community analysis. A knowledge gap still exists regarding whether the bioaerosol rRNA abundances are affected by the bioaerosol collection process. We investigated the effect of air sampling stress on the measurement and characterization of 16S rRNA for bioaerosols in the laboratory and field experiments using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and high-throughput sequencing techniques. In a laboratory study, known quantities of freshly grown Escherichia coli cells were spiked onto the filter of a Button Aerosol Sampler and into liquids of BioSampler and SpinCon air samplers and then exposed to sampling stress when the samplers were operated for 2h. We found that the recovered cellular 16S rRNA abundance as determined by qPCR was dependent on sampler type. Further, two devices (Button Aerosol Sampler and BioSampler) that exhibited markedly different efficiency in preserving 16S rRNA were employed in an outdoor environment to collect bioaerosols simultaneously on eight days in two different seasons. The abundance of 16S rRNA in the outdoor air sample (1.3×106-4.9×107copies/m3) was about two orders of magnitude higher than that of 16S rRNA gene (6.9×103-1.5×105copies/m3). The 16S rRNA sequences revealed a different bacterial community compared with 16S rRNA gene-based results across all samples, and this difference depended on the sampling device. In addition, a number of bacterial taxa exhibited higher abundance in the 16S rRNA gene sequences than in 16S rRNA sequences, which suggests the potential activities of certain microbes in airborne phase. Overall, this study highlights the importance of sampling device selection when analyzing RNA in bioaerosols.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA sequencing; Bioaerosols; Microbial community; Sampling device; Stress; rRNA:rDNA ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29079080      PMCID: PMC5805565          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  54 in total

1.  Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler.

Authors:  V Aizenberg; S A Grinshpun; K Willeke; J Smith; P A Baron
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2000 May-Jun

2.  Comparative 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA sequence analysis indicates that Actinobacteria might be a dominant part of the metabolically active bacteria in heavy metal-contaminated bulk and rhizosphere soil.

Authors:  Fabienne Gremion; Antonis Chatzinotas; Hauke Harms
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Short-term temporal variability in airborne bacterial and fungal populations.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Zongzhi Liu; Mari Rodríguez-Hernández; Rob Knight; Matthew Henn; Mark T Hernandez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy.

Authors:  Qiong Wang; George M Garrity; James M Tiedje; James R Cole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Degradation of stable RNA in bacteria.

Authors:  Murray P Deutscher
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Detection of fecal bacteria and source tracking identifiers in environmental waters using rRNA-based RT-qPCR and rDNA-based qPCR assays.

Authors:  Tarja Pitkänen; Hodon Ryu; Michael Elk; Anna-Maria Hokajärvi; Sallamaari Siponen; Asko Vepsäläinen; Pia Räsänen; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Sources of bacteria in outdoor air across cities in the midwestern United States.

Authors:  Robert M Bowers; Amy P Sullivan; Elizabeth K Costello; Jeff L Collett; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Effects of atmospheric humidity and temperature on the survival of airborne Flavobacterium.

Authors:  R Ehrlich; S Miller; R L Walker
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-12

10.  Molecular Evidence for Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Atmosphere.

Authors:  Ann M Klein; Brendan J M Bohannan; Daniel A Jaffe; David A Levin; Jessica L Green
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.809

3.  Performance evaluation of high-volume electret filter air samplers in aerosol microbiome research.

Authors:  Kari Oline Bøifot; Jostein Gohli; Gunnar Skogan; Marius Dybwad
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2020-07-28

4.  Canopy Position Has a Stronger Effect than Tree Species Identity on Phyllosphere Bacterial Diversity in a Floodplain Hardwood Forest.

Authors:  Martina Herrmann; Patricia Geesink; Ronny Richter; Kirsten Küsel
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.552

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.