Literature DB >> 10883591

Perceptual magnet and phoneme boundary effects in speech perception: do they arise from a common mechanism?

P Iverson1, P K Kuhl.   

Abstract

The question of whether sensitivity peaks at vowel boundaries (i.e., phoneme boundary effects) and sensitivity minima near excellent category exemplars (i.e., perceptual magnet effects) stem from the same stage of perceptual processing was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants gave phoneme identification and goodness ratings for 13 synthesized English /i/ and /e/ vowels. In Experiment 2, participants discriminated pairs of these vowels. Either the listeners discriminated the entire range of stimuli within each block of trials, or the range within each block was restricted to a single stimulus pair. In addition, listeners discriminated either one-step or two-step intervals along the stimulus series. The results demonstrated that sensitivity peaks at vowel boundaries were more influenced by stimulus range than were perceptual magnet effects; peaks in sensitivity near the /i/-/e/ boundary were reduced with restricted stimulus ranges and one-step intervals, but minima in discrimination near the best exemplars of /i/ were present in all conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883591     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  A temporally dynamic context effect that disrupts voice onset time discrimination of rapidly successive stimuli.

Authors:  Jacqueline Liederman; Richard Frye; Janet McGraw Fisher; Kimberly Greenwood; Rebecca Alexander
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

2.  Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Natalya Kaganovich; Courtney Driscoll-Huber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Birds tune in to sequential information when categorizing their songs.

Authors:  Julia Fischer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception.

Authors:  Yakov Kronrod; Emily Coppess; Naomi H Feldman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

5.  A new view of language acquisition.

Authors:  P K Kuhl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Increased Response to Altered Auditory Feedback in Dyslexia: A Weaker Sensorimotor Magnet Implied in the Phonological Deficit.

Authors:  Mark R van den Bunt; Margriet A Groen; Takayuki Ito; Ana A Francisco; Vincent L Gracco; Ken R Pugh; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Modeling the categorical perception of speech sounds: a step toward biological plausibility.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Hannu Tiitinen; Patrick J C May
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Accent processing in dementia.

Authors:  Julia C Hailstone; Gerard R Ridgway; Jonathan W Bartlett; Johanna C Goll; Sebastian J Crutch; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Asymmetries in Vowel Perception: An English-French Cross-Linguistic Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Linda Polka; Monika Molnar; T Christina Zhao; Matthew Masapollo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.