Literature DB >> 10881612

The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: support for non-selective access to bilingual memory.

A M de Groot1, P Delmaar, S J Lupker.   

Abstract

In three experiments we looked at the processing of interlexical homographs by Dutch-English bilinguals. In Experiment 1 we employed the translation recognition task, a task that forces the participants to activate both language systems simultaneously. In this task the processing of interlexical homographs was inhibited substantially compared to the processing of matched control words, especially when the homograph reading to be selected was the less frequent of the homograph's two readings. In Experiments 2 and 3 we used the lexical decision task: In one condition we asked the participants to categorize letter strings as words or nonwords in Dutch; in a second condition we asked them to do so in English. The makeup of the stimulus set in Experiment 2 permitted the participants to ignore the instructions and to instantiate the task in a language-neutral form--that is, to categorize the letter strings as words in either Dutch or English. Under these circumstances a small, frequency-dependent inhibitory effect for homographs was obtained, but only in condition Dutch. In Experiment 3 the participants were forced in a language-specific processing mode by the inclusion of "nonwords" that were in fact words in the non-target language. Large frequency-dependent inhibitory effects for homographs were now obtained in both language conditions. The combined results are interpreted as support for the view that bilingual lexical access is non-selective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10881612     DOI: 10.1080/713755891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  33 in total

1.  Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts.

Authors:  Janet G Van Hell; Ton Dijkstra
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision.

Authors:  Kristin Lemhöfer; Ton Dijkstra
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

3.  Spatiotemporal distribution of cortical processing of first and second languages in bilinguals. I. Effects of proficiency and linguistic setting.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Dalal Abu-Amneh Abbasi; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Spatiotemporal distribution of cortical processing of first and second languages in bilinguals. II. Effects of phonologic and semantic priming.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Dalal Abu-Amneh Abbasi; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Chinese-English bilinguals reading English hear Chinese.

Authors:  Yan Jing Wu; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Bilingualism as a desirable difficulty: Advantages in word learning depend on regulation of the dominant language.

Authors:  Cari A Bogulski; Kinsey Bice; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2018-08-10

7.  Effects of cognate status on word comprehension in second language learners: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Performance Differences in Hindi and English Speaking Bilinguals on Stroop Task.

Authors:  Kalyani Datta; Naresh Nebhinani; Abhinav Dixit
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-12

9.  Word Naming in Bodo-Assamese Bilinguals: The Role of Semantic Context, Cognate Status, Second Language Age of Acquisition and Proficiency.

Authors:  Sugandha Kaur
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

10.  Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals.

Authors:  Ileana Ratiu; Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Tamiko Azuma; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.