Literature DB >> 31399874

Performance Differences in Hindi and English Speaking Bilinguals on Stroop Task.

Kalyani Datta1, Naresh Nebhinani2, Abhinav Dixit3.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found that bilinguals differ in their response times on the bilingual version of Stroop Task. Automaticity and control and Language proficiency have emerged as important factors that lead to differences in the response time. This study aimed to understand Stroop Effect in Hindi-English bilinguals on the computerized version of Hindi and English language Stroop task. The study was conducted on 42 Hindi-English bilinguals. All were more proficient in the Hindi language as compared to the English Language. Results of the study revealed greater Stroop Effect in the English language as compared to the Hindi language.

Keywords:  Automaticity and control; Bilingualism; Cognition; Language proficiency; Stroop task

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31399874     DOI： 10.1007/s10936-019-09667-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN： 0090-6905


  10 in total

1.  The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: support for non-selective access to bilingual memory.

Authors:  A M de Groot; P Delmaar; S J Lupker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

2.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Jeremy R Gray; Christopher F Chabris; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Ageing and bilingualism: absence of a "bilingual advantage" in stroop interference in a nonimmigrant sample.

Authors:  Shanna Kousaie; Natalie A Phillips
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Testing a model for bilingual semantic priming with interlingual homographs: RT and N400 effects.

Authors:  Roel Kerkhofs; Ton Dijkstra; Dorothee J Chwilla; Ellen R A de Bruijn
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Is bilingual lexical access influenced by language context?

Authors:  Silke Paulmann; Kerrie E Elston-Güttler; Thomas C Gunter; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Maya R Libben; Debra A Titone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Intralanguage vs. interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems.

Authors:  S P Fang; O J Tzeng; L Alva
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-11

8.  Performance of bilinguals in a picture-word interference task.

Authors:  L C Ehri; E B Ryan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1980-05

9.  Stroop effect in Spanish-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Mónica Rosselli; Alfredo Ardila; Mirtha N Santisi; María Del Rosario Arecco; Judy Salvatierra; Alejandra Conde; Bonie Lenis
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Language conflict in the bilingual brain.

Authors:  Walter J B van Heuven; Herbert Schriefers; Ton Dijkstra; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.