Literature DB >> 10879946

Pupillary dilation response as an indicator of auditory discrimination in the barn owl.

A D Bala1, T T Takahashi.   

Abstract

The pupil of an awake, untrained, head-restrained barn owl was found to dilate in response to sounds with a latency of about 25 ms. The magnitude of the dilation scaled with signal-to-noise ratio. The dilation response habituated when a sound was repeated, but recovered when stimulus frequency or location was changed. The magnitude of the recovered response was related to the degree to which habituating and novel stimuli differed and was therefore exploited to measure frequency and spatial discrimination. Frequency discrimination was examined by habituating the response to a reference tone at 3 kHz or 6 kHz and determining the minimum change in frequency required to induce recovery. We observed frequency discrimination of 125 Hz at 3 kHz and 250 Hz at 6 kHz--values comparable to those reported by others using an operant task. Spatial discrimination was assessed by habituating the response to a stimulus from one location and determining the minimum horizontal speaker separation required for recovery. This yielded the first measure of the minimum audible angle in the barn owl: 3 degrees for broadband noise and 4.5 degrees for narrowband noise. The acoustically evoked pupillary dilation is thus a promising indicator of auditory discrimination requiring neither training nor aversive stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10879946     DOI: 10.1007/s003590050442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  18 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation?

Authors:  Shai Netser; Yael Zahar; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Shunsuke Kidani; Makoto Yoneya; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

3.  Transient pupil response is modulated by contrast-based saliency.

Authors:  Chin-An Wang; Susan E Boehnke; Laurent Itti; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sensitivity of the mouse to changes in azimuthal sound location: angular separation, spectral composition, and sound level.

Authors:  Paul D Allen; James R Ison
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 5.  Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 6.  Auditory processing, plasticity, and learning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Jose L Pena; William M DeBello
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2010

7.  Learned modification of the nictitating membrane reflex by auditory stimuli in the barn owl.

Authors:  Avinash D S Bala; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Barn Owl's Auditory Space Map Activity Matching Conditions for a Population Vector Readout to Drive Adaptive Sound-Localizing Behavior.

Authors:  Roland Ferger; Keanu Shadron; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.709

9.  Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Yaminah D Carter; J Michelle Njoroge; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Auditory spatial acuity approximates the resolving power of space-specific neurons.

Authors:  Avinash D S Bala; Matthew W Spitzer; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.