Literature DB >> 26163191

Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness.

Hsin-I Liao1, Shunsuke Kidani2, Makoto Yoneya2, Makio Kashino2,3, Shigeto Furukawa2.   

Abstract

A pupillary dilation response is known to be evoked by salient deviant or contrast auditory stimuli, but so far a direct link between it and subjective salience has been lacking. In two experiments, participants listened to various environmental sounds while their pupillary responses were recorded. In separate sessions, participants performed subjective pairwise-comparison tasks on the sounds with respect to their salience, loudness, vigorousness, preference, beauty, annoyance, and hardness. The pairwise-comparison data were converted to ratings on the Thurstone scale. The results showed a close link between subjective judgments of salience and loudness. The pupil dilated in response to the sound presentations, regardless of sound type. Most importantly, this pupillary dilation response to an auditory stimulus positively correlated with the subjective salience, as well as the loudness, of the sounds (Exp. 1). When the loudnesses of the sounds were identical, the pupil responses to each sound were similar and were not correlated with the subjective judgments of salience or loudness (Exp. 2). This finding was further confirmed by analyses based on individual stimulus pairs and participants. In Experiment 3, when salience and loudness were manipulated by systematically changing the sound pressure level and acoustic characteristics, the pupillary dilation response reflected the changes in both manipulated factors. A regression analysis showed a nearly perfect linear correlation between the pupillary dilation response and loudness. The overall results suggest that the pupillary dilation response reflects the subjective salience of sounds, which is defined, or is heavily influenced, by loudness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audition; Autonomic nervous system; Endocrine system; Loudness; Pupil; Rating; Salience

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26163191     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0898-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  27 in total

1.  Pupillary dilation response as an indicator of auditory discrimination in the barn owl.

Authors:  A D Bala; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Scaling loudness, noisiness, and annoyance of aircraft noise.

Authors:  B Berglund; U Berglund; T Lindvall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pupil dilation during visual target detection.

Authors:  Claudio M Privitera; Laura W Renninger; Thom Carney; Stanley Klein; Mario Aguilar
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Large pupils predict goal-driven eye movements.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Alisha Siebold; Mieke Donk; Françoise Vitu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-04-13

7.  Auditory response properties of neurons in deep layers of cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  L Z Wise; D R Irvine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The pupillary light reflex in normal subjects.

Authors:  C J Ellis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline's Role in Decision Making.

Authors:  Kerstin Preuschoff; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Pupil dilation signals uncertainty and surprise in a learning gambling task.

Authors:  Claudio Lavín; René San Martín; Eduardo Rosales Jubal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  17 in total

1.  Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Bonnie Brown; Kelsey Mankel; Caitlin Nelms Price
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Pupil-Linked Arousal Response Reveals Aberrant Attention Regulation among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Sijia Zhao; Yajie Liu; Kunlin Wei
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Pupil drift rate indexes groove ratings.

Authors:  Connor Spiech; George Sioros; Tor Endestad; Anne Danielsen; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Yaminah D Carter; J Michelle Njoroge; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Human Pupillary Dilation Response to Deviant Auditory Stimuli: Effects of Stimulus Properties and Voluntary Attention.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Makoto Yoneya; Shunsuke Kidani; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  The effect of distraction on change detection in crowded acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Theofilos Petsas; Jemma Harrison; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa; Maria Chait
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Microsaccadic Eye Movements but not Pupillary Dilation Response Characterizes the Crossmodal Freezing Effect.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Hsin-I Liao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-30

8.  Pupil dilation reflects the time course of emotion recognition in human vocalizations.

Authors:  Manuel Oliva; Andrey Anikin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Multivoxel codes for representing and integrating acoustic features in human cortex.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Sukhbinder Kumar; Maria Chait; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.